King Charles Cuts Ties: Harry and Meghan Removed from Royal Website

In a surprising turn of events, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been quietly removed from the official royal website, a move that has sparked discussions among royal watchers.

This change comes amidst a series of updates to the royal family's online presence, aimed at correcting various errors that had plagued the site for some time.

The royal website has seen its share of inaccuracies, particularly regarding Prince Harry's profile.

Reports from the Daily Express indicated that the website still incorrectly referred to him as His Royal Highness and made repeated references to the late Queen as the reigning monarch.

In fact, there were at least 74 instances where this mistake was noted, prompting royal aides to take action.

However, while some errors have been addressed, the profiles of Harry and Meghan remain outdated.

The couple's page still suggests they are active royals, claiming they split their time between the UK and North America and that they reside at Frogmore Cottage.

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams expressed concern that these inaccuracies give off an impression of being disconnected from reality, emphasizing the urgent need for an update.

Recent changes to the royal website included new images showcasing Princess Kate with elders, as well as visuals from King Charles and Queen Camilla's coronation.

Interestingly, the order of appearance for royal family members now reflects their current ranks, placing Harry, Meghan, and Prince Andrew at the bottom, following the removal of Harry's title.

Despite the updates, some reports indicate that inaccuracies still linger on the Sussexes' profile page.

A statement dated January 2020 misleadingly implies that the couple continues to fulfill obligations to the King, the Commonwealth, and their patrons.

However, Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals back in February 2021, a fact that seems lost in the website's narrative.

At Buckingham Palace, efforts are underway to rectify these issues, with officials acknowledging the extensive nature of the website, which contains over 5,000 pages.

While they are working to ensure everything is accurate, some content may remain outdated until the comprehensive review is finished.

Fitzwilliams also pointed out misleading information regarding Meghan's previous patronages, including her roles with the Royal National Theatre and the Association of Commonwealth Universities, which she no longer holds.

Similarly, Harry's biography still inaccurately states their residence at Frogmore, despite the couple having moved out earlier this year.

As the royal family navigates these updates, many are left wondering about the implications of such inaccuracies.

The perception of the royal family can be significantly affected by how they present themselves online, especially in an age where information travels fast and the public's attention is fleeting.

So, what do you think about this latest development?

Have you checked out the newly updated royal website?

The persistent inaccuracies surrounding Prince Harry's profile raise questions about the royal family's communication strategy.

What changes do you believe are necessary to bring the information up to date?

The royal family's digital presence is crucial in shaping public perception, and it will be interesting to see how they address these ongoing discrepancies.

As the situation unfolds, fans and followers alike will be keeping a close watch on any further updates or changes.