Karma Strikes as Justice Fancourt Denies Harry’s $2.5 Million Legal Fees Request

Prince Harry faced a shocking blow as Justice Fancourt denied his request for $2.5 million in legal fees, leading to his deportation from the U.S.

The legal battle between Prince Harry and the Merrick Group's newspaper has been ongoing, with Harry's lawyers pushing for MGM to pay nearly £2 million in legal costs.

In a recent development, Harry was granted £40,000 in compensation in December after a judge determined that 15 out of the 33 articles presented in the trial involved phone hacking or illegal information gathering.

Despite this victory, the awarded sum is just a fraction of what Harry had initially sought.

Notably, Prince Harry has multiple lawsuits pending against tabloid publishers, with the legal action against MGM being just one of them.

Following a ruling by MGM last month, Harry hailed himself as a dragon slayer and expressed his determination to pursue a career in tabloid journalism.

Interestingly, Harry recently dropped a defamation case against the Daily Mail publisher following an unfavorable pre-trial decision.

The judge's ruling highlighted the prevalence of phone hacking and illegal information gathering in the articles under scrutiny, leading to the £40,000 damages awarded to Harry in December.

During Monday's hearing, the focus was on the legal fees related to a trial involving Harry and three other plaintiffs, including members of the Coronation Street cast.

While the judge acknowledged the violation of privacy rights for all four plaintiffs, he dismissed the claims brought by actor Nicky Sanderson and comedian Fiona Paul's ex-wife due to late filing.

Harry's lawyer, David Sherborn, emphasized the success of their case and insisted on the repayment owed to their clients, signaling Harry's readiness to testify further.

On the other hand, Attorney Roger Milla argued that the payment of legal fees should be limited to specific aspects of the claim, labeling the ruling as a miscarriage of justice.

Looking ahead, Timothy Fand indicated that a ruling on HEDs (High-Energy Density) would be made at a later date.

Harry alleges that his privacy was infringed upon in over 148 articles and has pushed for a trial on the remaining 115 counts.

Despite MGM's undisclosed settlement offer to Prince Harry, the legal battle continues.

Criticism from royal fans has been directed at Harry, with some questioning his motives and comparing his legal outcomes unfavorably to those of Prince William.

The stark difference in damages awarded to William, who donated his compensation to Harry's charity, has fueled speculation and discontent among supporters.

Some observers have expressed skepticism towards Harry's legal team, suggesting ulterior motives and financial interests driving their actions.

The dynamics within the royal family and the public perception of the ongoing legal disputes have sparked debate and scrutiny, with differing opinions emerging on the handling of the situation.

In light of these developments, the intricacies of Prince Harry's legal battles and the broader implications for his reputation and standing within the royal family continue to unfold.

As the saga unfolds, the nuances of the legal proceedings, personal motivations, and public reactions shape the narrative surrounding Prince Harry's pursuit of justice and accountability.