Karl Stefanovic Dismisses Prince Harry’s Memoir as “Cheap Rubbish”

In a fiery segment on the Today Show, host Karl Stefanovic took aim at Prince Harry's new memoir, “Spare,” which has stirred up considerable controversy with its explosive claims about the royal family.

Joined by journalist Sarah LeMaquand and Tasmanian senator Jackie Lambie, Stefanovic didn't hold back his disdain for the book, labeling it as nothing more than “cheap rubbish.” His remarks come amid a growing conversation about the impact of Harry's revelations.

The discussion kicked off when LeMaquand expressed her support for Prince Harry, describing him as a “boy frozen in trauma” since the death of his mother, Princess Diana.

She emphasized that this emotional backdrop is crucial to understanding the prince's narrative.

“He has a right to tell his story,” she asserted, suggesting that the memoir sheds light on Harry's long-standing conflicts with his father, which she believes have been overshadowed by public scrutiny of Meghan Markle.

Stefanovic, however, was not swayed by LeMaquand's defense.

He argued that anyone could criticize the royal family if they chose to write a tell-all book, implying that Harry's insights lacked depth and were merely sensational.

His dismissal of the memoir raises questions about the authenticity of Harry's experiences and whether they truly reflect the complexities of royal life.

In “Spare,” Harry recounts a series of personal anecdotes that range from the mundane to the shocking.

For instance, he reveals a dramatic altercation between his wife, Meghan, and sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, over a bridesmaid's dress that left Meghan in tears.

He also shares a rather bizarre detail about suffering frostbite on his p-nis during a trip to the North Pole, alongside the revelation that he is uncircumcised.

The memoir doesn't shy away from Harry's past drug use either.

He candidly admits to experimenting with substances like cocaine, ketamine, and cannabis, painting a picture of a young man grappling with his identity amidst the pressures of royal expectations.

Additionally, he discusses seeking guidance from a medium who claimed to connect him with his late mother, providing a glimpse into his struggles with grief and loss.

During his appearance on “Good Morning America,” Harry further elaborated on the media's portrayal of the royal family.

He suggested that the public often consumes royal news as entertainment, blurring the lines between genuine reporting and sensationalism.

When asked if the family dynamics resembled a soap opera, he agreed, highlighting the theatrical nature of their lives.

Yet, this very notion was met with skepticism by some, including Strahan, who questioned the ethics of profiting from personal hardships.

Harry acknowledged that many might view his memoir as a cash grab but insisted that his motivation was rooted in exposing the truth behind the media's portrayal of his family.

Despite Harry's intentions, critics argue that he fails to provide an accurate historical context in his memoir.

For example, he incorrectly claims a direct lineage to Henry VI, the founder of Eton College, where both he and Prince William were educated.

This assertion has been debunked, as Henry VI had only one child, who died young without leaving any descendants.

The inaccuracies in Harry's family history raise more questions about the credibility of his narrative.

If he can't get basic genealogical facts right, how can readers trust the more intimate details he shares?

This inconsistency further fuels the debate over the validity of his claims and the motivations behind his memoir.

As the fallout from “Spare” continues, it's clear that Harry's revelations have sparked a significant cultural conversation.