Is Baby Archie a Royal Ruse?

The Shocking Claims Surrounding His Christening

In a whirlwind of controversy, claims have emerged suggesting that Baby Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor's christening was more of a staged spectacle than a genuine family affair.

Archie, now three years old, was christened in July 2019, just two months after his birth and six months before his parents, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, stepped back from royal duties.

The event was attended by various prominent figures, including Kate Middleton, Prince William, and even Princess Diana's sisters, Lady Jane Fellowes and Lady Sarah McCorquodale.

However, recent comments from Lady Jane have sparked a firestorm on social media, with her allegedly confirming that Archie may not be real.

Eyewitness accounts describe a shocking atmosphere during the ceremony, where attendees reportedly felt uneasy about the authenticity of the child.

According to sources, Lady Jane recalled a moment where she exchanged glances with Meghan, feeling as though the Duchess was issuing a challenge with her gaze.

The skepticism surrounding Archie's existence has only intensified.

Critics have noted that the children of Harry and Meghan rarely appear in public, leading to rampant speculation.

Some observers have gone so far as to suggest that the couple has never had any children at all.

Lady Jane described the children as looking unnaturally lifelike, comparing them to “silicone products” and even mentioning a disturbing smell that left her feeling nauseated during the christening.

As the chatter grows, many are questioning the legitimacy of Harry and Meghan's parenting.

Reports indicate that Harry has been seen spending time away from his supposed children, frequenting a private members' club in Los Angeles.

This has raised eyebrows and fueled theories that their family life is merely a façade.

The mystery surrounding Archie and his sister Lilibet continues to perplex the public, with whispers suggesting that Archie may have been born via a surrogate, while Lilibet's existence remains in doubt.

Adding to the intrigue, Meghan has been spotted in public settings, but some observers claim she was carrying a doll instead of a real child.

This bizarre claim further deepens the narrative that the couple is struggling to maintain their fabricated storyline.

Meghan's past statements about wanting to “break the internet” seem to align with her desire for constant media attention, regardless of the nature of the coverage.

If children truly exist within this marriage, many argue that they should be showcased more frequently.

Critics suggest that Meghan could easily share her experiences as a mother, promoting books or videos about parenting, which would undoubtedly attract attention.

The absence of such content raises further questions about the authenticity of their family life.

In light of these allegations, calls for transparency from King Charles have grown louder.

Many believe that the royal family should address what could become known as one of the biggest scandals in royal history.

The implications of these claims are vast, and the need for clarity has never been more pressing.

Meanwhile, reports have surfaced indicating that Prince Harry has pitched an idea for his podcast on Spotify that includes discussions about fatherhood.

This proposal has only added fuel to the fire, with critics questioning how they could possibly continue to perpetuate this narrative if the children are indeed non-existent.

The situation begs the question: how far can this charade go?

The notion that they could maintain such a deception indefinitely seems increasingly implausible.

As speculation mounts, many are left wondering about the fate of Archie and Lilibet, should they actually exist.

The royal family is under scrutiny like never before, and the stakes are high.

If these children are real, their well-being must be prioritized above all else.

But if they are merely a product of an elaborate ruse, the repercussions could be monumental.