Howard Stern Slams Harry and Meghan’s Netflix Docuseries: “Whiny Bitches”

American radio legend Howard Stern didn't hold back his thoughts on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's new Netflix documentary, delivering a scathing critique that has caught the attention of many.

During a recent episode of his Sirius XM show, the 68-year-old host expressed his disdain for the couple, labeling them as “whiny bitches” and admitting that watching the first three episodes was a painful experience.

The docuseries kicks off with Prince Harry drawing parallels between his late mother, Princess Diana, and Meghan, while also addressing issues like unconscious bias and the harassment he faced during press calls orchestrated by the palace.

However, Stern wasn't impressed.

He barely made it through the first episode before he was fed up.

“It's been painful,” he stated, adding that while he usually watches shows with his wife, he found the Sussexes' portrayal grating.

Stern acknowledged Prince Harry's anger towards the royal family, particularly regarding how they treated his mother.

“They treated her like shit,” he remarked, specifically calling out Prince Charles for his behavior towards Diana.

Despite this empathy, Stern felt that the couple's complaints came off as excessively whiny.

“When those two start whining, it's just very weird to watch,” he said, pointing out the contradiction in their desire for privacy while simultaneously airing their lives on Netflix.

The radio host's comments echo a broader sentiment shared by others.

Piers Morgan, known for his sharp critiques, tweeted that the docuseries was “worse than keeping up with the Kardashians,” a sentiment that struck a chord with many viewers.

Royal expert Nick Bullen also weighed in, suggesting that Harry and Meghan have effectively transformed their lives into a regal version of reality television.

Bullen noted that while the series might be entertaining for viewers, it raises questions about the couple's claims of wanting privacy.

“Why do they feel the need to share that with us if they want to keep some privacy in their lives?” he pondered.

The juxtaposition of their desire for a quiet life against the backdrop of a highly publicized series surprised many commentators.

Critics have pointed out that the documentary lacks the editorial balance typically associated with traditional documentaries.

According to Bullen, “It's not a documentary; it's a reality show.” He emphasized that real documentaries involve diverse opinions and questions, which are notably absent in Harry and Meghan's portrayal of events.

In one segment of the series, Meghan expressed her discomfort with the engagement interview she did alongside Harry back in November 2017.

She likened the experience to being part of a scripted reality show, where they were guided on what to say and do, including showcasing her engagement ring.

Bullen countered this view, reminding viewers that such interviews are standard practice for royal engagements.

He argued that these interviews have historically followed established royal protocols and shouldn't be dismissed as reality television.

“I don't think anyone would ever describe those engagement interviews as a reality show,” he asserted, highlighting the choreographed nature of these public appearances.

As the conversation around Harry and Meghan's docuseries continues, it's clear that opinions are divided.

Some find the couple's story compelling, while others, like Stern and Morgan, see it as an exaggerated display of grievances.

The ongoing debate raises critical questions about the nature of celebrity, privacy, and the expectations placed on public figures.

With the docuseries garnering significant attention, it remains to be seen how audiences will react to the subsequent episodes.

Will viewers continue to tune in, or will the backlash from critics like Stern and Morgan lead to a decline in interest?