**Harry and Meghan’s Night Out Sparks Controversy**

Harry and Meghan were spotted as they made their way to a luxurious private members club in Los Angeles on Wednesday, sans children once again.

Harry appeared somewhat dazed, while Meghan seemed ecstatic to be caught by the paparazzi.

The LA photographers demonstrated their prowess by capturing the couple’s arrival at the San Vincente bungalows precisely.

It seemed as though they had been tipped off to snap a few pictures, especially given the recent news of their eviction from Frogmore.

Inside the car, it was evident that there had been a heated argument between the two.

Meghan appeared to be recoiling from Harry, who initially looked startled but then appeared to be under the influence of some substance, sporting a grin alongside his wife.

The news of their eviction from Frogmore cottage had undoubtedly set the stage for their first public outing, drawing mixed reactions from the American public.

Pam from New Jersey dismissed the evening as a mere publicity stunt, questioning the necessity for the couple to travel two hours from their Montecito residence to the lavish San Vincente bungalows in downtown LA on a weeknight.

She insinuated that the carefully orchestrated photoshoot was nothing more than a PR move, criticizing their lack of transparency regarding their children’s whereabouts.

Meanwhile, US resident Milona hinted at the irony of the extravagant night out conflicting with the couple’s purported desire for privacy.

Jenny from North Carolina and Stella from Virginia adopted a more nonchalant stance, viewing the paparazzi coverage as a typical occurrence in Hollywood.

Stella emphasized the routine nature of celebrities being photographed in California, dismissing the incident as insignificant.

Jenny echoed similar sentiments, expressing indifference towards Harry and Meghan’s public appearances, considering them no different from any other celebrity in the US.

Body language expert Judy James analyzed the couple’s behavior during the outing, identifying potential emotional cues and behavioral patterns related to their eviction.

Harry exhibited signs of self-protection and vulnerability in response to the news, as noted by Ms. James.

His actions, such as turning up his jacket collar and fidgeting with his clothing, indicated underlying anxiety and discomfort.

Furthermore, his gesture of burying his hand deep into his pocket suggested a desire to shield himself from the situation.

Ms. James highlighted Harry’s apparent anxiety and protective demeanor, likening his actions to those of a sheepdog herding his group into the venue.

She interpreted their smiles as forced rather than genuine, implying that the couple’s jovial facade was a deliberate performance in light of the eviction news.

On the other hand, Meghan’s body language hinted at vulnerability, contrasting with Harry’s tension and unease.

In conclusion, Harry and Meghan’s night out stirred controversy and speculation among onlookers, prompting varied interpretations of their actions and emotions.

The public’s reactions ranged from skepticism to indifference, reflecting the ongoing scrutiny surrounding the couple’s public image.

Despite their efforts to project a composed front, subtle cues in their body language betrayed underlying tensions and vulnerabilities, offering a glimpse into the complexities of their highly scrutinized lives.