Harry and Meghan’s Controversial L.A. Visit Sparks Outrage

In a move that has stirred up quite the storm, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle recently visited a food bank in Los Angeles, which is currently grappling with devastating wildfires.

This appearance, however, was met with harsh criticism from notable figures in Hollywood, including actor James Woods and actress Justine Bateman.

Their arrival, complete with baseball caps, seemed more like a photo opportunity than an act of genuine support amid the chaos surrounding them.

As the wildfires wreak havoc across the region, Bateman took to social media to voice her disapproval.

She labeled their visit as nothing short of a “repulsive photo-op,” suggesting that the couple resembled “ambulance chasers” who were merely there to capitalize on the disaster.

Her biting remarks didn't hold back, questioning if Harry and Meghan were now acting as politicians or disaster tourists.

James Woods, known for his sharp tongue and wit, joined the conversation shortly after returning to his home in Pacific Palisades, which thankfully escaped the flames.

He expressed his relief online but couldn't resist taking a jab at the couple's antics.

Woods retweeted a post that sarcastically asked, “Haven't they suffered enough?”

This comment struck a chord, highlighting the absurdity of Harry and Meghan's presence during such a serious crisis.

The backlash against the couple escalated as social media erupted with reactions ranging from scathing critiques to humorous jabs.

One user went so far as to label Meghan a “malignant narcissist,” accusing her of being self-centered and bringing along a camera crew for the occasion.

The sentiment was clear: true compassion doesn't need a film crew.

As the criticism continued to pour in, other commenters chimed in, questioning the couple's motives.

One quipped about the possibility of another Netflix documentary, while another pointed out that they didn't even consider evacuation routes.

The implication was that their presence was more about gaining publicity than offering real help.

Adding fuel to the fire, the satirical website Babylon Bee weighed in with a tongue-in-cheek article claiming that Los Angeles was saved simply by Meghan Markle standing around in her baseball cap.

The piece humorously suggested that the city would even award her the key to the city and erect a monument in her honor.

It was a clear mockery of the couple's perceived self-importance during a crisis.

The tone of the online discourse suggested that Harry and Meghan's star power is waning.

Once basking in the royal glow, their actions are now being interpreted as royal cringe.

Many are growing weary of their performative gestures, and it's becoming increasingly evident that their attempts to engage with communities are falling flat.

Even residents of Los Angeles seem to share this sentiment, with one sarcastic remark pointing out the absurdity of spending time with “grifters” rather than focusing on local needs.

The frustration is palpable, as locals are left to navigate the aftermath of the wildfires while feeling sidelined by the couple's PR efforts.

This incident raises questions about celebrity involvement in crises.

Are their intentions genuine, or is it all just a spectacle?