Harry and Meghan Ordered to Permanently Vacate Frogmore Cottage

Prince Harry has received confirmation that his ties with the royal family have been irreversibly severed following King Charles' decision regarding Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.

Reports indicate that King Charles has instructed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to vacate their Windsor residence permanently, signaling a significant low point in their already strained relationship.

While discussions regarding the future of the property have been ongoing, the monarch's final decision to sell it came after Harry penned his revealing memoir, “Spare,” potentially indicating the king's discontent with his son's portrayal of the royal family.

Sources close to the couple, speaking to their unofficial biographer Omid Scobie, have revealed that Harry and Meghan are shocked by the king's directive.

Frogmore Cottage was considered the only safe haven for the couple and their children during visits to the UK, making the news particularly unsettling for them.

Their recent visit for the Queen's Platinum Jubilee Festivities in June highlighted their vulnerability, as they no longer receive police protection, a matter that has now reached the high court.

By revoking Harry's refuge at Frogmore Cottage, the king is essentially conveying to his son that he is no longer welcome in the country.

In the event of future visits or royal occasions, the Sussexes will need to find alternative accommodations.

Options may include staying with Princess Eugenie or Princess Beatrice, Harry's cousins with whom they share a close bond, or opting for a luxurious London hotel.

However, given their strong emphasis on privacy, the latter seems less likely.

With a deadline looming for their departure from the residence, Harry and Meghan have limited time to make alternative arrangements.

The timing coincides with the upcoming coronation in May, an event the king reportedly wishes his son to attend.

However, the decision regarding Frogmore Cottage underscores the finality of Harry's separation from the royal family, indicating little room for reconciliation.

The heart of the matter lies in a father's frustration over his son's public criticisms of the monarchy and personal attacks on family members.

The situation appears more dire than anticipated, especially considering Harry and Meghan's lack of a permanent home in the UK, making a swift return unlikely.

Meanwhile, in another development, tensions rise as a DUP MP hints at rejecting the Brexit deal, prompting Chancellor Rishi Sunak to brace for potential revolt.

Amid ongoing discontent over the government's use of the monarchy to advance its Windsor plan for Northern Ireland, DUP member Sammy Wilson has strongly suggested his party's opposition to Sunak's framework.

Criticism has also been directed at the government's handling of negotiations involving the king, with concerns raised about politicizing the monarchy.

As dissent simmers within Tory ranks, the repercussions of leveraging royal support for political agendas remain a contentious issue.

Mr. Wilson's reservations echo those of other Northern Ireland unionists, including Dame Arlene Foster, who caution against the government's reliance on the monarchy in brokering deals.

The delicate balance between political interests and royal involvement has sparked debate, with Mr. Wilson emphasizing the risks associated with exploiting the monarchy for political gain.

The unfolding scenario underscores the complexities of navigating political alliances amid heightened scrutiny over the monarchy's role in governance.