Frogmore Cottage Family Portrait Sparks Controversy

Harry and Meghan Markle recently shared a family photoshoot taken in the garden of their Frogmore Cottage residence during their visit to Britain for the Queen's Jubilee.

The pictures capture a moment from Lilibet's sole trip to the UK, where the family made a brief stop in London for the Jubilee celebrations.

Despite leaving the Platinum Jubilee festivities early, skipping the pageant and balcony appearance with the Queen, the couple managed to squeeze in a charming family portrait session.

One particular photograph shows Meghan and Harry strolling through the lush garden at Frogmore.

The Duke lovingly carries his daughter Lilibet on his shoulders, while Markle cradles their son Archie in her arms.

Both children are dressed smartly for the occasion, with Lilibet in a dress, cardigan, and a bow hairband, and Archie sporting a white shirt and jacket.

However, speculations have arisen regarding the authenticity of the photo, with some suggesting potential digital alterations.

Observers have pointed out discrepancies, such as Harry's shirt collar being fully visible at the back, raising doubts about whether Lilibet was genuinely perched on his shoulders or digitally added post-production.

Critics like Benjamin Smallbrook and Quora have criticized the quality of the editing, fueling discussions about the credibility of the image.

The photographer, Misson Harriman, now faces scrutiny as the focus shifts to the perceived flaws in the picture.

Markle, who prefers to keep a low profile amidst public skepticism, is unlikely to welcome this additional controversy.

The debate extends to the proportions within the photo, as some note a discrepancy in height between Harry and Meghan.

Observers argue that Meghan appears shorter than her actual height of 5 foot 7 compared to Harry, who stands at 6 foot 1, suggesting potential inconsistencies in the image.

Questions also arise concerning the interaction between the children and their parents in the photograph.

Social media users have pointed out perceived lack of connection, with one user questioning Archie's posture when held by Meghan and another speculating on the number of images used to compose the final shot.

The absence of the children in the flight dossier upon their return home prompts further inquiries into their travel arrangements and the possibility of commercial flights with nannies.

Moreover, discrepancies in the shadows cast by the family and surrounding trees have been highlighted, adding to the skepticism surrounding the authenticity of the image.

The incongruities in the shadows' directions have raised doubts about the spatial coherence of the scene depicted in the photograph.

As the debate over the family portrait intensifies, the controversy surrounding the authenticity and composition of the image continues to capture public attention.