Ford and eBay’s CEO Remove Harry from Billionaire Union as Duke’s $10 Million Donation Stolen from Archwell

Prince Harry, after attributing his departure from the royal family to negative media influence, has joined forces with a group of billionaires in a significant move to impact local newspapers nationwide.

Operating under the collective name Press Forward, this coalition has secured funding from Prince Harry's Archwell Foundation and 21 other contributors, with the primary objective of supporting struggling local newsrooms across the United States.

Their initial commitment stands at $500 million, with aspirations to raise a total of one billion dollars over the next five years.

While their stated mission revolves around empowering communities and upholding democratic values, skepticism arises due to Harry's public criticism of journalists and the affiliations of his associates, such as Pierre Omidyar, known for backing censorious non-profits in the past.

Despite the involvement of 21 additional donors in the initiative, doubts linger regarding Prince Harry's genuine commitment to financial contributions.

Harry insists that the funds channeled through Archwell are intended for this purpose, with approximately $10 million remaining in the account, sparking concerns about alignment with the original donor's intentions.

This discrepancy could potentially lead to legal repercussions against Archwell, introducing complexities and uncertainties into the funding landscape.

Noteworthy figures like Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay, and members of the Ford family fortune have also pledged support to Press Forward, underscoring the breadth of influential backers rallying behind the cause.

Pierre Omidyar's track record reflects a history of philanthropic endeavors, including substantial donations through his non-profit Luminati, notably contributing over $1 million to the Global Disinformation Index.

While the financial commitments from these prominent billionaires appear substantial, Prince Harry's comparatively modest contribution of $10 million, sourced outside of his official capacity as a Duke, raises questions about the cohesion and sustainability of the collaborative effort.

Such discrepancies could potentially impede the progress of the initiative, complicating fundraising efforts for Archwell moving forward.

The implications of leveraging donations to acquire for-profit entities for the purpose of silencing dissent and restricting free speech present a contentious narrative that may deter prospective donors from engaging with Press Forward.

Moreover, the sentiments expressed by donors affiliated with Press Forward towards the Supreme Court, a critical bastion safeguarding journalistic freedoms, hint at underlying tensions and ideological clashes within the media landscape.

The alignment of conservative justices with principles opposing censorship, as evidenced by recent legal rulings, juxtaposed against the backdrop of mounting attacks from media outlets associated with Prince Harry's camp, underscores the intricate dynamics shaping the narrative surrounding journalistic integrity and freedom of expression.

A discernible trend emerges concerning the strategic utilization of agenda-driven local news platforms to influence electoral outcomes, potentially reshaping the political landscape not only in America but also on a global scale.

The deployment of substantial financial resources by well-funded groups to bolster localized media outlets underscores the pivotal role of quality journalism in preserving the fabric of democracy.