Explosive Claims: Meghan Markle’s Conduct Under Fire in New Interview

In a recent interview that has sent shockwaves through royal circles, author Angela Levin has laid bare some startling allegations against Meghan Markle, drawing from leaked emails that reveal troubling behavior during her time as a working royal.

This revelation comes as no surprise to those familiar with the Duchess of Sussex, who has faced scrutiny for her interactions with royal staff and her overall conduct within the monarchy.

Angela Levin appeared on TalkTV to discuss her latest book about Prince Harry when the conversation took a dramatic turn.

Host Mike Graham introduced the topic of emails exchanged between Meghan and her former communications secretary, Jason Knopf.

These emails, as Levin pointed out, shed light on Meghan's treatment of staff during her tenure at Kensington Palace, painting a less-than-flattering picture of her royal experience.

According to Levin, the emails suggest a pattern of behavior where Meghan exerted undue pressure on her staff.

She reportedly pulled all-nighters to rewrite letters and statements without consulting those who had originally drafted them.

This not only undermined the efforts of her team but also raised questions about her respect for the boundaries that should exist in a professional environment.

Levin's description of Meghan's behavior was particularly poignant.

She expressed sadness over the apparent lack of respect Meghan showed towards her staff, expecting them to be available around the clock to meet her demands.

This portrayal aligns with previous accusations of bullying that have surfaced against Meghan, reinforcing the idea that her time as a royal was marred by a sense of entitlement.

The interview escalated as Levin accused Meghan of lacking a genuine sense of duty and a willingness to learn the intricacies of royal life.

Instead, she claimed Meghan preferred to operate on her own terms, often disregarding the traditions and protocols that accompany royal responsibilities.

Levin emphasized that while Meghan severed ties with her own family, she demanded unwavering loyalty from her palace staff.

As the conversation unfolded, Levin became increasingly animated, likening Meghan's actions to those of an insecure teenager desperate to manipulate her narrative through intimidation.

She argued that the emails illustrated Meghan's struggle with understanding personal boundaries and respecting the time of others, portraying her as a Hollywood social climber who believed her royal status afforded her the right to mistreat those around her.

Anger was palpable in Levin's voice as she condemned Meghan's treatment of low-paid staff, whom she described as vulnerable and deserving of compassion.

Levin asserted that Meghan's motivations seemed rooted in self-interest rather than any genuine commitment to her royal duties.

This perspective painted a stark image of a woman more concerned with her ego than with serving the public.

Perhaps the most striking moment of the interview came when Levin declared Meghan unfit for royal life based on the contents of the emails.

Her fervent claims suggested that Meghan's actions were indicative of a broader pattern of selfishness and irrationality, leaving little room for sympathy.

Levin's fiery rhetoric underscored the depth of her convictions regarding Meghan's character and suitability for her title.

By the end of the segment, Levin's frustration was evident, and even Graham appeared taken aback by the intensity of her criticism.

This interview marked one of the most scathing public denunciations of Meghan Markle to date, leaving little doubt about Levin's stance on the matter.

She made it clear that, in her view, Meghan's behavior was indefensible.

In the aftermath of Levin's revelations, the response has been polarized.

Supporters of Meghan argue that the narrative presented is one-sided, emphasizing the need for context and understanding of workplace dynamics.

They contend that without a full picture, it's unfair to draw harsh conclusions about Meghan's conduct.

Conversely, those aligned with the monarchy and sympathetic to royal staff have praised Levin for her courage in speaking out against what they perceive as toxic behavior.

They argue that it's essential to advocate for those who may have suffered in silence under Meghan's leadership.

The ongoing debate raises significant questions about the royal family's handling of Meghan's conduct and whether they should have addressed these issues more seriously from the outset.

As this story continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how both sides will navigate the fallout from Levin's explosive claims.