Exploitation Allegations Surface Against Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Aides

The Department of Education has revealed disturbing allegations of exploitation involving Megan, who is accused of pocketing $2,000 from 409 underprivileged students at a public school.

A scandal has emerged surrounding the aides of Megan and Harry, as they stand accused of silencing both staff and pupils at a school featured in a Netflix series.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex made a visit to Public School 123 in New York City back in 2021, where it is claimed that their employees attempted to impose a gagging clause to prevent any negative feedback about the royal visit.

During their visit to the poverty-stricken school, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle generously donated two garden boxes filled with fresh vegetables and herbs.

However, concerns arose when some parents alleged that the produce was inedible, largely rotten, and unfit for consumption.

Megan's team attributed this to shipping issues, but critics argue that fresh produce is readily available in the vicinity of the school, casting doubt on the explanation provided.

While at the school, Meghan, aged 42, engaged with the students by reading excerpts from her children's book, “The Bench,” published in June 2021.

Subsequently, reports surfaced indicating that school authorities were instructed not to post any negative comments regarding the visit on social media, both at the time and in the future.

This directive came amidst growing discontent among parents who felt that Meghan's actions were more focused on self-promotion rather than genuine support for the underprivileged children.

Allegations intensified when it was claimed that Meghan requested students to contribute five dollars each towards a charity, a move perceived by some as exploitative.

Parents expressed outrage upon discovering that the funds raised were allegedly directed towards the couple's personal charity foundation, rather than a specified charitable cause as initially implied.

This revelation raised questions about the true intentions behind Meghan's philanthropic gestures during the school visit.

Further scrutiny revealed that representatives from Archwell, the couple's foundation, were involved in orchestrating a press release that included the controversial gagging clause.

Emails exchanged with the Department of Education sought legal approval for the clause, while also aiming to downplay references to Meghan's book to avoid excessive promotion.

Additionally, the couple's team reportedly barred four British newspapers from covering an event at the World Trade Center, indicating a pattern of selective media engagement.

The planning for the school visit, where Meghan sported a lavish five-thousand-pound suit and Cartier accessories, was documented six months in advance, shedding light on the meticulous preparation behind the royal couple's public appearances.

The unfolding saga has sparked widespread debate about the ethical conduct of celebrities in their philanthropic endeavors, particularly within vulnerable communities.

As the controversy continues to unravel, questions linger over the true motives driving acts of charity and goodwill in the public eye.