Earl Spencer Takes Stand Against Meghan’s Influence, Excludes Archie and Lily from Spencer Inheritance

Renowned author Tom Bower's latest book, “Revenge: Meg and Harry and the War Between the Windsors,” has caused a stir by delving into the intricate dynamics of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's relationship.

Bower's extensive research involved conversations with 80 individuals closely acquainted with the royal couple, unveiling a series of shocking revelations.

Among the explosive claims made in Bower's book is the revelation that Meghan struggled to establish rapport with Harry's circle of friends.

Additionally, the palace reportedly intervened in the production of the TV series “Suits” after Harry and Meghan's romance became public knowledge, prompting significant alterations.

A particularly intriguing narrative from Bower's book revolves around Diana, Princess of Wales's brother, Earl Spencer.

Allegedly, Earl Spencer was urged to caution his nephew about his relationship with Meghan.

Despite Harry's hopes that Diana's family would see similarities between Meghan and his late mother, Earl Spencer, Lady Sarah McCordell, and Baroness Jane Fellows expressed skepticism about Meghan's compatibility with the royal family.

Harry's introduction of Meghan to Diana's sisters and close friend Julia Samuel did not yield the anticipated recognition of parallels between Meghan and Diana.

The lack of perceived resemblance between Meghan and Diana left Harry disheartened, as his family and friends doubted Meghan's ability to integrate into the royal fold.

Earl Spencer, following William's request, advised Harry to reconsider the pace of his courtship with Meghan, citing his own marital experiences.

This counsel incited a sharp reaction from Harry, foreshadowing the challenges that lay ahead in integrating Meghan into the royal sphere.

Financial concerns also plagued Harry, who grappled with the prospect of supporting Meghan without relying solely on his annual stipend from Prince Charles.

Meghan's acting career was suggested as a means to supplement their income, reflecting Harry's apprehensions about their financial stability post-marriage.

In a separate development, the controversy surrounding Archie and Lilibet's royal titles has intensified following Queen Elizabeth's passing.

Despite being designated prince and princess, Archie and Lilibet are excluded from the honorifics of “his” or “her royal highness,” owing to their non-active royal status.

Royal biographer Angela Levin recently criticized Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, asserting that Harry is unduly influenced by his wife.

Levin lambasted Meghan for her purported ingratitude towards the royal family, highlighting her perceived disregard for the privileges afforded to her through marriage.

Levin's scathing commentary extended to the couple's Netflix series, “Harry and Meghan,” where she accused Meghan of seeking to dismantle the institution of the monarchy.

The biographer emphasized the need to defend the royal family against what she deemed as the couple's disrespectful conduct, signaling a call to action to safeguard the monarchy's integrity.