The News
Earl Charles Shuts Down Sussexes’ Bid for Spencer Title Amid Royal Rebranding Rumors
In a surprising turn of events, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are reportedly considering a significant rebranding move that involves abandoning their Windsor surname in favor of adopting the Spencer title, a nod to Prince Harry's late mother, Princess Diana.
However, this potential shift has not gone unnoticed by Charles Spencer, Diana's brother, who has firmly rejected any notion of granting them the family name.
The couple's discussions about this name change seem to have intensified following the recent termination of their lucrative Spotify deal, which has left them seeking new avenues for financial support.
Royal author Tom Bauer suggests that this rebranding is not just a fleeting thought but a calculated move to align more closely with Diana's legacy.
He noted that Meghan Markle has long admired Diana, expressing a desire to embody her spirit.
Bauer elaborated on GB News, revealing that Meghan envisions herself as the new Diana, even suggesting they should drop the Windsor name entirely.
This would mean Meghan would be known as Meghan Spencer, while Harry would also adopt his mother's maiden name.
The idea is to create a fresh identity for themselves, distinct from their royal past.
It's clear that Harry and Meghan have been contemplating this shift for some time, discussing it not only among themselves but also with others in their circle.
Bauer emphasized that this is a serious effort to redefine their public personas as Harry and Meghan Spencer, distancing themselves from their former royal titles.
Since stepping back from royal duties in 2020, the couple has engaged in various business ventures, including partnerships with Netflix and Penguin Random House.
Their journey has been marked by a mix of successes and challenges, with content creation often taking longer than anticipated.
For instance, it took nearly two years for Meghan's podcast, Archetypes, to materialize after their Spotify deal was struck.
Despite the couple's attempts to carve out a new path, not everyone is convinced that adopting the Spencer name is a wise choice.
Royal commentator Angela Levin has voiced strong opposition to the idea, calling it “nonsense.” She argues that such a move would be disingenuous, especially since Meghan never had a personal relationship with Princess Diana.
Levin further criticized the timing of these rumors, suggesting they might be a strategic distraction from negative press surrounding the Sussexes.
She questioned the rationale behind adopting a name that holds no personal connection for Meghan, who has only visited Diana's grave once.
This debate over the potential name change raises broader questions about identity and legacy within the royal family.
As Harry and Meghan navigate their post-royal lives, they appear to be searching for ways to connect with the past while forging their own future.
The couple's journey has not been without its controversies, and this latest development is likely to spark further discussion about their intentions and authenticity.
Their efforts to rebrand themselves as Harry and Meghan Spencer could be seen as an attempt to capitalize on Diana's enduring popularity.
As the story unfolds, it remains to be seen how the public will react to this potential shift.
Will the Sussexes successfully reinvent themselves, or will the idea of adopting the Spencer title fade into the background like so many other royal rumors?
Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the saga of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continues to captivate audiences around the globe.