Dutch Journalist Criticizes Meghan for Accusations Against Princess Michael of Kent and King Charles

A new book has sparked controversy, reigniting tensions between the Sussexes and the Royals.

Meghan Markle's claims in the book have raised eyebrows, particularly her assertion that a royal questioned the skin color of her son, Archie.

According to Omid Scobie, not just one, but two royals were allegedly involved in these conversations.

The upcoming book, “Endgame Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival,” reportedly includes letters from Meghan to King Charles, naming the individuals in question.

However, Dutch journalist Rick Evers, who has already read the book, reveals that Charles and Princess Michael of Kent are named as the alleged discriminators.

Evers suggests that the book exposes a series of letters exchanged between Charles and Meghan, witnessed by a staff member.

In these letters, Charles expressed disappointment over the growing distance between them following Meghan's interview with Oprah Winfrey.

He emphasized that there was no malice or prejudice towards his future grandson.

Evers points out that Charles had shown support for Meghan in various ways, including walking her down the aisle during the wedding and organizing a gospel choir to honor her heritage.

Despite these gestures, Meghan's accusations have stirred controversy.

Evers questions Meghan's motives, suggesting that she may be the one perpetuating falsehoods.

He highlights Meghan's past efforts to manipulate narratives and create rifts within the royal family.

The journalist raises doubts about the authenticity of the leaked letters, emphasizing that private correspondence between Charles and Meghan would be closely guarded.

Evers speculates that the leaks may be part of a deliberate strategy to undermine certain members of the royal family.

He references a previous incident where Meghan's letters to the King were leaked to the press, hinting at a pattern of calculated disclosures.

Regarding Princess Michael of Kent, Evers disputes claims that she questioned Archie's skin color, noting that there is no evidence of direct communication between her and Meghan.

He recalls a previous controversy involving Princess Michael wearing a controversial brooch to a royal event, which was perceived as racially insensitive.

Despite apologizing for the incident, Princess Michael faced criticism for her choice of accessory.

Evers also criticizes Omid Scobie, the co-author of the book, for his alleged bias towards Harry and Meghan.

He suggests that Scobie's close relationship with the couple may have influenced his portrayal of the royal family.

Evers highlights Scobie's recent claims that he was sidelined from royal engagements due to his association with Prince Harry, questioning the journalist's objectivity and motives.

In conclusion, the revelations in the book have reignited debates surrounding Meghan's interactions with the royal family.

Evers' analysis sheds light on the complexities of the situation, raising questions about transparency, trust, and accountability within the monarchy.

The ongoing saga between the Sussexes and the Royals continues to captivate audiences, with each new development adding layers to an already intricate narrative.