Blaming the Royals: How Harry and Meghan’s Financial Woes Unfolded

Author Omid Scobie has stirred up controversy by pointing fingers at King Charles for the financial struggles faced by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

According to Scobie, the royal couple's decision to sign lucrative commercial deals with Netflix and Spotify was a direct result of the King cutting off their financial support.

He suggested that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex felt compelled to secure these deals in order to maintain their lifestyle after their finances were abruptly halted.

Scobie highlighted the King's alleged mishandling of the Megxit saga as a pivotal factor in pushing Harry and Meghan towards these commercial ventures.

Despite initial financial assistance provided by the King during their first year, including contributions towards Frogmore Cottage and their wedding expenses, the couple found themselves in need of substantial funds for ongoing security and living expenses.

After stepping down as senior working royals and relocating to the United States in 2020, Harry and Meghan inked multi-million dollar contracts with major entertainment platforms.

These deals, which included a £81 million agreement with Netflix and an £18 million partnership with Spotify, exposed intimate details about the royal family through projects like the Netflix series “Harry and Meghan” and Harry's memoir “Spare.”

Scobie insinuated that the Sussexes' decision to become disruptors within the royal family was a direct consequence of the King's handling of their departure from Britain.

Despite opting out of official royal duties and moving abroad, Harry and Meghan have faced criticism for their perceived greed and sense of entitlement, especially in light of the financial support they received prior to the fallout with the royal family.

In his recent book “Endgame,” Omid Scobie quoted Harry and Meghan expressing a desire to be heard, suggesting that King Charles' stubbornness had hindered their attempts to find common ground.

The abrupt cutoff of all financial assistance for the couple in July 2020, including security funding previously covered by the King's private income, further strained their financial situation.

Scobie also shed light on the fact that Meghan had been exploring commercial opportunities even before her relationship with Harry began in 2016.

The decision to pursue these deals was driven by the marketability of their story and the potential for financial gain, rather than a genuine desire to share their experiences or insights.

Critics have accused the Duke and Duchess of Sussex of exploiting their royal titles for personal profit, tarnishing the reputation of the monarchy in the process.

Scobie's remarks about the couple's reliance on airing “dirty laundry” to secure financial stability have sparked a heated debate about the ethics of their business ventures and their treatment of the royal family.

Ultimately, the blame game between the Sussexes and the royal family has escalated, with accusations of blackmail and entitlement flying from both sides.

The Harkles' contentious departure from their royal duties without consulting the Queen, coupled with their pursuit of commercial interests overseas, has fueled animosity and resentment within the royal circle.

As tensions continue to mount, it remains to be seen whether Harry and Meghan's quest for financial independence will further strain their relationship with the monarchy or lead to a reconciliation based on mutual respect and understanding.

The repercussions of their choices may have far-reaching implications for the future of the royal family and the public's perception of its members.