Bethany Frankel Exposes the Crumbling Illusion of Meghan and Harry’s Royal Brand

In a recent social media outburst, Bethany Frankel, the founder of Skinnygirl and an outspoken entrepreneur, shared her candid views on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

In a video that quickly went viral, she pulled no punches, declaring that Meghan and Harry's royal facade is finally being revealed for what it truly is: a meticulously constructed illusion that is now starting to fall apart.

This commentary comes at a pivotal moment, as the couple's standing in both the U.S. and the U.K. appears to be slipping.

Frankel has been vocal about the Sussexes before, particularly after their infamous interview with Oprah Winfrey.

However, this time, she escalated her criticism, suggesting that their influence in Hollywood is diminishing at an alarming rate.

She believes that what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of building a brand on weak foundations.

The couple's initial exit from royal life, often referred to as “Megxit,” was marketed as a quest for independence and privacy.

Yet, their subsequent actions have raised eyebrows, as they seem to exploit their royal ties while simultaneously critiquing the institution that provides them with a significant portion of their public interest.

Diving deeper into their business model, Frankel pointed out a troubling trend.

She argued that Meghan and Harry's strategy—constantly positioning themselves as victims while cashing in on lucrative deals—is becoming increasingly transparent to the public and industry insiders alike.

According to Frankel, the entertainment world is beginning to see through what she describes as their smoke-and-mirrors approach to celebrity.

One of the most striking elements of Frankel's analysis is what she calls the “nobody effect.”

Without their royal connections, she contends that Meghan and Harry would merely be another celebrity couple trying to find their footing in Hollywood.

Their high-profile deals with Netflix and Spotify, she argues, were largely secured due to their royal association rather than any specific talents or expertise in the entertainment sector.

Frankel's comments come on the heels of several setbacks for the Sussexes.

Their Spotify partnership ended prematurely, Netflix projects have received mixed reviews, and their public appearances have sparked more controversy than acclaim.

Frankel sees these developments as symptomatic of a larger trend: the couple's declining returns in the entertainment industry.

What lends weight to Frankel's critique is her own experience navigating the entertainment and business landscapes.

Having transitioned successfully from reality TV to entrepreneurship, she possesses a keen understanding of celebrity dynamics and brand creation.

Her insights into Meghan and Harry's strategy—or lack thereof—are rooted in genuine industry knowledge rather than mere speculation.

The former reality star also highlighted a disconnect between the couple's statements and their actions.

While they continue to profit from their royal ties, they simultaneously criticize the royal family, creating a paradox that Frankel believes is unsustainable.

This approach not only appears hypocritical but could also jeopardize their long-term prospects in both public life and the entertainment industry.

Frankel's observations about the Sussexes' media strategy were particularly sharp.

She noted a predictable pattern emerging: a cycle of victimhood followed by high-profile interviews or content releases, which is often followed by complaints about privacy invasion.

This repetitive narrative, she argues, is alienating even those who initially supported their cause.

Moreover, Frankel pointed out a crucial misjudgment in Meghan and Harry's approach to celebrity.

They seem to underestimate that while American audiences may have been intrigued by royal connections, they ultimately value authenticity and concrete achievements over titles and inherited status.

This miscalculation is evident as their projects fail to garner the anticipated level of interest and success.

Looking ahead, Frankel predicts that unless there is a significant shift in strategy, Meghan and Harry risk fading into irrelevance in both the entertainment sphere and public discourse.

Signs of this decline are already visible, including waning media interest and growing public fatigue with their narrative.

The impact of Frankel's comments is amplified by her credibility as a successful media figure and entrepreneur.

Many industry insiders share similar sentiments privately, but Frankel's public critique has brought these concerns into the spotlight.

Her analysis not only addresses the couple's public persona but also scrutinizes their business decisions, questioning the wisdom behind a content strategy centered on personal grievances and family drama.

The reaction to her remarks has been largely supportive, with many social media users and commentators echoing her assessment.

Some have praised her for articulating what they believe to be obvious truths about the couple's situation, while others have noted how her insights align with the observable decline in the Sussexes' influence.

As the couple navigates this challenging period, Frankel's critique underscores a growing consensus that their current approach is unsustainable.

The revelations regarding their media strategy and public image coincide with a critical juncture for Meghan and Harry, whose ventures have not yielded the expected results.

This moment could very well be a turning point, forcing them to reconsider how they engage with the public and the media as they strive to maintain relevance in an ever-evolving landscape.