Awkward Coronation Souvenir Sparks Controversy Over Sussexes’ Absence

The official souvenir programme for King Charles III's coronation has stirred quite a buzz, thanks to a rather uncomfortable photo inclusion.

This 84-page keepsake, which retails for £20, hit the shelves just ahead of the grand event scheduled for Saturday, May 6.

Among its pages is a full-page snapshot featuring King Charles, Queen Camilla, and the Prince and Princess of Wales alongside Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, despite Meghan's absence from the festivities.

What makes this choice even more intriguing is that Meghan will be staying in California to celebrate their son Archie's birthday, leaving many to question the decision to include a photo taken back in 2018 for the King's 70th birthday.

This particular image has now become a focal point of discussion, with some suggesting it serves as a clever jab from Buckingham Palace.

The absence of the couple's children in the photo only adds fuel to the fire, leading to speculation about their existence in royal circles.

Critics have been quick to point out the awkwardness of the situation, especially since no recent family photos have been captured of the Sussexes with their children, Archie and Lilibet, alongside their grandparents.

Some have even suggested that this absence could hint at a broader narrative where the children might be quietly sidelined in royal history.

When it was announced that only Prince Harry would be attending the coronation, eyes turned to Meghan, with many attributing blame to her for keeping their children away from their grandfather.

Dan Wooten, a columnist for the Daily Mail, took to Twitter to express his thoughts, insinuating that Meghan's decision was a deliberate avoidance of potential backlash from the public.

His comments sparked a flurry of reactions, with royal enthusiasts and critics alike weighing in on the matter.

Responses to Wooten's tweet varied widely, with some expressing sympathy for the King, while others defended Meghan's stance.

One user noted that the King already has three grandchildren he knows well, implying that Harry's children shouldn't overshadow the existing royal lineage.

Another pointed out that Charles is free to visit Archie and Lilibet whenever he wishes.

Meanwhile, sources close to the Sussexes suggest they are contemplating strategies to leverage the royal titles bestowed upon their children.

This comes amid ongoing speculation regarding Prince Harry's financial situation, with rumors swirling about mounting debts since relocating to the United States.

Many are curious about how the couple plans to manage their finances moving forward.

Despite the royal family's support, there are whispers that the Sussexes may not be entirely satisfied with their current arrangement.

Reports indicate that the benefits provided by Buckingham Palace are primarily intended for the grandchildren's initial expenses, which raises questions about the couple's long-term financial strategy.

In light of these developments, it's clear that the dynamics between the Sussexes and the royal family continue to evolve.

With the coronation approaching, the absence of Meghan and their children has become a talking point that reflects deeper issues within the family.

As the public eagerly awaits King Charles III's coronation, the drama surrounding the Sussexes adds an unexpected twist to the royal narrative.

The inclusion of the controversial photo in the souvenir programme seems to symbolize the ongoing tensions and complexities within the royal family, leaving many to wonder what the future holds for Harry, Meghan, and their children.