**Archwell Foundation Faces Backlash Over Alleged Political Empowerment Programme Partnership**

An announcement made by Archwell regarding a partnership with an organization to launch a political empowerment program in the US stirred controversy before swiftly being taken down on September 25th.

The PR company representing Meghan Markle revealed that the Archwell Foundation is expanding its efforts to support Afghan refugees through a collaboration with Mina's List.

Previously, the couple had visited Liberty Village, a transitional facility for 11,000 refugees, and contributed to four charities aiding Afghan families.

However, the wording of the announcement raised eyebrows, creating an impression that Rachel, not the foundation, was the primary benefactor behind the aid efforts.

Critics pointed out the vagueness surrounding the couple's monetary donations, questioning the depth of their involvement in various initiatives.

The timing of Archwell's announcement of donating feminine hygiene products to Gianko coincided with the removal of the controversial political project post, which some viewed as a strategic diversion from negative press related to alleged exploitation at a Harlem school.

Speculation arose about Meghan's potential return to a paid-for philanthropy image-building campaign.

Subsequently, Mina's List refuted any claims of collaboration or contributions from Meghan, prompting Archwell to retract its initial announcement.

Notably, the absence of any mention of Archwell on Mina's List website further fueled skepticism regarding the foundation's credibility in political and empowerment endeavors.

Critics emphasized the couple's penchant for leveraging their titles in charitable and political spheres without substantial financial backing or proven impact.

The scrutiny intensified as past instances, such as the controversial Kerry Kennedy award acquisition, resurfaced.

Attendees who reportedly paid exorbitant sums for tables at the event were left disappointed by the Harkles' late arrival and swift departure, devoid of expected interactions with affluent guests.

Meghan's selective association with high-profile individuals over wealthy benefactors was highlighted as a strategic misstep contributing to her public image challenges.

Amidst ongoing controversies, recent remarks by royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams underscored the potential pitfalls facing Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in Hollywood.

Fitzwilliams cautioned against the couple's reliance on titles and emphasized the entertainment industry's preference for tangible success over royal affiliations.

The duo's transformation of the Invictus Games into a personal publicity platform drew criticism for overshadowing the event's core purpose of honoring military veterans.

Fitzwilliams' analysis resonated with sentiments questioning the Sussexes' authenticity and long-term viability in the public eye.

Harry's perceived erratic behavior and Meghan's selective interactions with prominent figures were cited as detrimental to their reputations.

As Harry approaches his 40th year, the imperative for the couple lies in redefining their public image through genuine efforts and a departure from self-serving narratives.

The road ahead demands a shift towards sincerity and meaningful contributions to secure their standing beyond superficial fame pursuits.