A Royal Wedding Mystery: The Truth Behind Meghan and Harry’s Vows

In a recent interview with Oprah Winfrey, the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, revealed a surprising detail about her marriage to Prince Harry.

She disclosed that they exchanged vows in a private ceremony in their backyard before the official royal wedding on May 19th.

This revelation has sparked widespread curiosity and debate about the legitimacy of their union.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, who officiated their wedding, confirmed that the legal ceremony took place on the scheduled date.

He emphasized the importance of the wedding certificate, stating that signing it under false pretenses would have constituted a serious crime.

This statement raises questions about the nature of the private ceremony that Meghan described.

Interestingly, Meghan was the one who requested this unconventional setup.

She envisioned a sacred gathering with just three people present.

This intimate request has left many wondering about the motivations behind it.

Furthermore, during the official ceremony, Meghan made another unexpected request: she asked the Archbishop to refer to her and Harry by their chosen names instead of their legal names, Rachel and Henry.

This deviation from standard practice is significant.

In legal terms, vows must include the individual's correct Christian names, which are required by law.

The implications of this choice could mean that their marriage might not hold up under legal scrutiny, as they did not use their official names during the vows.

An annulment could potentially come into play if there were any claims of fraud or misunderstanding between the parties involved.

Speculation suggests that the royal family was aware of this unusual arrangement, with hints that they viewed the marriage as somewhat dubious.

Reports indicate that Prince Charles visibly reacted when the Archbishop addressed him as Harry during the ceremony.

The Queen's reaction at the wedding also raised eyebrows.

It is rumored that she had explicitly instructed Meghan and Harry to use their full names during the vows, which adds another layer of complexity to the situation.

When the Queen learned that they had opted for their more casual names, it reportedly caused some tension.

Traditionally, marriage ceremonies in the Church of England require the full baptismal names of both parties to be used.

This custom has been followed in previous royal weddings, including that of Prince William and Kate Middleton.

For instance, during their vows, William was referred to by his full name, William Arthur Philip Lewis, while Catherine was called Catherine Elizabeth.

Meghan's legal name is actually Rachel Meghan Markle, a fact that may surprise many who know her only as Meghan.

Similarly, Harry's full name is Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales.

This distinction is crucial, especially considering that during the lead-up to their wedding, Meghan was consistently referred to as Miss Meghan Markle by Kensington Palace.

Moreover, the Queen's formal consent letter included both of their legal names, indicating that she recognized the importance of using their full identities in the context of their marriage.

The letter stated her consent to the matrimony between Prince Henry and Rachel Meghan, further underscoring the expectation that full names be acknowledged during the ceremony.

This situation highlights the tension between royal traditions and personal choices.

While Meghan and Harry sought to personalize their vows, they inadvertently strayed from established protocols.

The legal ramifications of their choices remain uncertain, but the intrigue surrounding their wedding continues to captivate audiences worldwide.

As more details emerge, public interest in the nuances of royal weddings is likely to grow.