**Meghan Markle Faces Backlash Over Alleged Involvement in Journalist’s Firing**

Rumors have been circulating regarding Meghan Markle's alleged role in the firing of black journalist Alison P Davies following an interview that reportedly did not meet expectations.

During the interview with The Cut, Meghan expressed her dissatisfaction with certain aspects of royal protocol, including the requirement for all photos to be approved by the royal family or the royal rota.

She also shared anecdotes about interactions with young girls who view her as a real-life princess.

The interview received criticism for not portraying Meghan in a favorable light, leading to backlash from individuals such as the Expose team at SMG.

Questions were raised about why Alison was being blamed for simply reporting her observations during her time with the former actress, especially considering she is a black woman, the same ethnicity that the sexbot Zedlista is designed to identify with.

Allegedly handpicked by Meghan for the feature, Alison was said to be on leave without pay, a situation deemed unfortunate by sources at Expose in SMG.

Reports suggest that Meghan displayed unprofessional behavior by making Alison wait outside Montessit show for an hour under the supervision of her security team.

In South Africa, where Meghan and Harry enjoy popularity, local publications like You magazine have taken notice of the situation.

Online reactions have varied, with one Twitter user expressing skepticism about Meghan's claim of being 43% Nigerian and questioning the authenticity of her roots.

The revelation came during an episode of the Archetypes podcast, sparking further discussions on social media platforms.

Recently, Meghan and Harry made updates to the homepage of their non-profit organization, Archwell.

The new layout features a photograph of the couple taken by their friend and photographer, Misan Hariman, along with a quote emphasizing the power of collective action to drive change in communities and the world.

Royal expert Angela Levin weighed in on the significance of the website update, interpreting it as a subtle message indicating the couple's independence from the royal family.

According to Levin, the inclusion of the quote reflects Meghan and Harry's desire to establish their own community and make a global impact, potentially signaling a shift away from their ties to the monarchy.

While the couple's actions may suggest a desire for autonomy, some critics argue that Meghan and Harry are still reliant on their royal connections.

Despite their efforts to distance themselves from traditional roles, the lingering attachment to their titles and privileges raises questions about the extent of their independence from the royal institution.