Connect with us

US News

Meghan Markle’s ‘Ghost Baby’ Photo Sparks Controversy: Was It All an Elaborate Hoax?

Photos: GETTY

The News

Meghan Markle’s ‘Ghost Baby’ Photo Sparks Controversy: Was It All an Elaborate Hoax?

In a surprising twist from Buckingham Palace, and are once again in the spotlight.

A photographer has stepped forward with shocking allegations about a viral photo that Meghan shared on her Archwell website back in 2021.

This image, which features Meghan holding her son , includes what some have dubbed a “ghost baby” lurking in the background.

The claim?

That this mysterious figure was digitally inserted to fuel speculation about Meghan's pregnancy.

To give you a bit of background, in October 2021, Meghan showcased several images on her website to promote her children's book, “The Bench.”

One particular photo caught everyone's attention—not for its heartwarming depiction of mother and child, but for the enigmatic figure partially hidden behind a tree.

Up until that point, Meghan had publicly acknowledged only as her child, leading to rampant speculation online.

Many wondered if this was evidence of a second pregnancy, even though no announcement had been made.

This intrigue intensified when Meghan and Harry eventually revealed the birth of their daughter, Diana, in June 2022.

However, the debate surrounding that peculiar photo didn't fade away.

Now, an anonymous photographer claims Meghan intentionally edited the image to include the ghostly figure, suggesting it was a calculated move to create buzz around her book before its release.

According to the photographer, who wishes to remain unidentified due to concerns over backlash, they were present during the official shoot for the book launch.

They assert that no other child or figure was visible during the original session.

Allegedly, weeks later, Meghan requested her team to alter the photo to insert the extra child, which raises significant questions about her motives.

The photographer insists they possess original, unedited files from the shoot that show no signs of the additional figure.

They argue that these untouched images reveal a clear background, contradicting the claims made by Meghan's camp.

If true, the implications for Meghan could be severe, casting doubt on her credibility and authenticity.

Should this accusation prove accurate, it would not only tarnish Meghan's public image but also suggest a deliberate attempt to mislead the public about her personal life.

The idea of fabricating a pregnancy narrative for promotional gain is indeed troubling.

But is this photographer genuinely revealing a scandal, or is there something more sinister at play?

While the allegations are serious, it's worth considering several factors that may undermine the photographer's claims.

For starters, despite their assertions, there has been no concrete evidence provided yet.

Where are the side-by-side comparisons or any tangible proof to support these accusations?

Without such evidence, the claims risk being dismissed as mere conjecture.

Moreover, why would Meghan, a high-profile figure, take the gamble of digitally altering a photo?

Given the scrutiny she faces, it seems unlikely she would engage in such a risky endeavor that could easily be disproven later.

It's also possible that she simply wasn't showing much at the time of the photoshoot, making the “ghost baby” an innocuous optical illusion rather than a deliberate fabrication.

Additionally, we're currently relying on one anonymous source, which raises questions about the credibility of their claims.

What are their true motivations for coming forward now?

Without corroboration, it's difficult to ascertain the validity of their story.

On the flip side, Meghan's history of managing her public image meticulously does lend some weight to the editing theory.

Some speculate that the timing of her acknowledgment of her second pregnancy, which came after her book launch, was strategically planned to coincide with promotional efforts.

As the mystery unfolds, one thing is clear: the world is watching.

Whether this is a case of digital deception or a mere misunderstanding, the implications for are significant.

Only time will tell how this saga develops, but for now, the debate rages on.

More in The News

Top stories

To Top