Meghan Markle’s Controversial Trademark: A Royal Family Rift?

In a recent revelation that's causing quite a stir, Meghan Markle's decision to trademark the name “Lilibet” before her daughter's birth has reportedly left the late Queen Elizabeth II feeling deeply upset.

This news, emerging from Robert Hardman's newly released book, Charles III, New King, New Court, has reignited discussions about the strained relationship between the Sussexes and the British royal family.

According to royal experts, Markle's move to secure a trademark for Lilibet, a name steeped in personal significance for the Queen, has sparked outrage among royal watchers.

Angela Levin, a prominent royal biographer, expressed her dismay on GB News, labeling the trademarking of such a cherished family name as “appalling.”

Levin emphasized that this action appears to be a calculated attempt to commercialize a name that holds profound emotional value for the Queen.

The name Lilibet has a rich history; it was a childhood nickname for Queen Elizabeth, stemming from her difficulty pronouncing her own name.

It was affectionately adopted by her grandfather, King George V, and became an intimate term used only by her closest family members, including her late husband, Prince Philip.

This context adds layers to the controversy surrounding the Sussexes' choice for their daughter.

Hardman's account indicates that the late Queen was blindsided by the announcement of the name.

An unnamed palace aide recounted that the Queen was visibly angry when the Sussexes claimed she had given her blessing for the name.

This reaction reportedly took place in 2021, shortly after the couple made their announcement, highlighting the unexpected tension it created within the royal family.

In private conversations with palace aides, the Queen allegedly expressed her feelings of loss regarding the use of her beloved nickname.

She reportedly stated, “I don't own the palaces or the paintings, only my name, and now they've taken that.”

This poignant remark underscores the Queen's view of Lilibet as a personal treasure, one that held special meaning within her family.

Conflicting reports have emerged regarding whether the Queen was consulted about the name.

Some sources claimed she felt pressured to agree, while others, including the BBC, indicated that she was not approached directly.

Buckingham Palace has maintained a silence on the matter, leaving the truth of these claims shrouded in ambiguity.

The Sussexes responded to the media uproar with legal challenges, asserting that reports of the Queen's objections were false.

Their spokesperson insisted that they had indeed discussed the name with the Queen, though the specifics of that conversation remain undisclosed.

This legal push reflects the couple's determination to protect their narrative amid swirling controversies.

Critics continue to debate the implications of the Sussexes' choice to trademark Lilibet.

Many see it as an attempt to leverage their royal connection while asserting their independence from royal duties.

Angela Levin articulated concerns over the commercialization of the Queen's nickname, insisting it should remain a private symbol of familial affection rather than a brand for public consumption.

During the discussion on GB News, host Eamon Holmes raised questions about the legality of the trademark, to which Levin confirmed that it was indeed secured prior to Lilibet's birth.

This revelation only deepens the scrutiny surrounding the Sussexes' actions, suggesting a potential conflict between personal sentiment and commercial interest.

As the public grapples with these revelations, opinions remain divided.

While some sympathize with the late Queen's reported feelings of intrusion, others defend the Sussexes, claiming their intentions were rooted in honoring the Queen's legacy.

The ongoing saga raises questions about the dynamics of the royal family and the complexities of modern celebrity culture.

As the story unfolds, royal enthusiasts are left speculating about the future of the Sussexes' relationship with the monarchy.

Both Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes have been approached for comments, but no formal statements have been issued yet.

The public remains keenly interested in how this situation will evolve, particularly as the couple navigates their roles as both public figures and entrepreneurs within the royal context.

What do you think about this unfolding drama?

Share your thoughts and let's keep the conversation going.