Will Archie and Lilibet Ever Become Prince and Princess?

The question of whether Archie and Lilibet will ever receive royal titles has stirred up quite a debate, particularly following Harry and Meghan's explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey.

During that conversation, they suggested that Archie was denied the title of prince due to his mixed-race heritage.

They also claimed this lack of title meant he wouldn't receive security, a statement that has been met with skepticism.

In reality, many royals in the UK do not have round-the-clock security despite holding titles.

Interestingly, Meghan herself contradicted some of her earlier claims in the same interview.

She acknowledged that the Letters of Patent clearly state Archie isn't entitled to be a prince at this time.

However, she hinted that this could change when Charles ascends to the throne.

This raises an intriguing question: should the British monarchy extend titles to Archie and Lilibet?

With Harry and Meghan currently perceived as unpredictable figures, the monarchy might want to reconsider how they approach royal titles for their children.

When Archie was born, Harry and Meghan initially expressed a desire for him to lead a “normal” life without the weight of royal titles.

At that time, the only title he was eligible for was Earl of Dumbarton, which they declined due to concerns about the connotations of the word “dumb.”

This decision sparked criticism, especially from those who felt it reflected a lack of understanding of British traditions.

The royal title system is rooted in historical regulations established by King George V in 1917, aimed at streamlining the number of princes and princesses.

This framework is still relevant today as many European monarchies continue to refine their titles.

The Letters of Patent dictate that children of a sovereign and the children of the sons of any sovereign are entitled to the style and title of royal highness, which includes the designation of prince or princess.

In the current line of succession, Archie stands seventh, while his sister Lilibet is eighth.

Despite their proximity to the throne, the monarchy has not amended the existing Letters of Patent to grant them titles.

This is largely because, despite their lineage, Archie and Lilibet are not expected to take on any official roles within the royal family.

Their parents' decision to step back from royal duties further complicates their potential connection to the monarchy.

Looking at other royal families, like Sweden's, we see a similar trend.

The Swedish royal household recently clarified the members of their royal family, excluding several grandchildren from official duties.

This reflects a broader movement across European monarchies to limit the number of working royals, ensuring that only those who actively represent the monarchy hold titles.

Harry and Meghan's claims regarding their children's titles seem out of touch with how modern monarchies operate.

For instance, Prince Edward chose not to bestow royal titles upon his children, Lady Louise and Viscount Severn, despite having the option.

This decision aligns with the trend of streamlining royal representation, a practice that appears to resonate with public sentiment.

As the monarchy continues to evolve, the potential for Archie and Lilibet to receive titles seems increasingly unlikely.

With Harry and Meghan residing in California, their children's ties to the UK are tenuous at best.

Archie spent only a few months in the UK before moving to the United States, while Lilibet has yet to visit the country.

Given this context, the notion of them being referred to as prince and princess feels somewhat superficial.

Charles and William may consider amending the Letters of Patent to stipulate that only children of the direct line who reside in the UK can hold the titles of prince and princess.

This would ensure that titles are reserved for those who actively engage with the monarchy and represent the UK.

It would also clarify the situation for Archie and Lilibet, who currently have little connection to their royal heritage.

While Harry and Meghan seem to express a desire for independence from royal life, they continue to leverage their titles for personal gain in Hollywood.

If Archie and Lilibet were granted royal titles, it could provide them with an additional level of prestige that might be exploited for career opportunities.

However, without a genuine connection to the UK, such titles could feel more like a marketing tool than a reflection of royal duty.

As the monarchy faces ongoing discussions about its relevance and future, it's crucial to consider who holds royal titles and what those titles represent.

The legacy of the monarchy is at stake, and the decisions made today will shape its future.

The question remains: should Archie and Lilibet receive royal titles, or is it time to redefine what it means to be part of the British royal family in the modern age?