Harry and Meghan’s CBS Interview: A Social Media Circus with No Substance

In a recent CBS interview, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attempted to tackle the weighty topic of children and social media.

But let's face it—when discussing the dangers of social media for kids, one might expect a bit more substance, especially from a couple that has stepped away from royal duties.

Right from the start, the discussion spiraled into a series of contradictions, leaving viewers questioning the authenticity of their claims.

The interview kicked off with an exploration of the risks social media poses for children.

However, considering that Archie is just five years old and Lilibet is three, the relevance of this segment seemed laughable.

After all, neither of them is likely to be scrolling through Instagram or tweeting anytime soon.

CBS producers appeared to struggle with how to make this topic engaging, which only added to the awkwardness.

Gossip guru Neil Sean revealed that CBS had initially planned to include heartwarming scenes featuring Archie, hoping to add a personal touch to the narrative.

The idea was to showcase the couple enjoying family moments—walking, playing, you know, the usual staged content.

But here's the kicker: trying to create a coherent discussion about social media dangers in relation to toddlers proved to be nearly impossible.

Archie was meant to be the highlight of the interview, but at the last minute, his appearance was scrapped due to, wait for it, a cold.

How convenient!

This sudden change left CBS scrambling, stripping the segment of its intended emotional appeal and turning it into a chaotic affair.

Adding to the drama was the backdrop of CBS's financial struggles.

The network is currently grappling with budget cuts and layoffs, which undoubtedly impacted the quality of the interview.

With strained finances, CBS seemed unable to produce high-quality segments, which was evident throughout the broadcast.

The irony of the situation deepened as Harry and Meghan discussed their commitment to privacy.

They have often positioned themselves as advocates for keeping their children out of the limelight.

Yet, this self-proclaimed privacy stance contradicts their previous actions, where they showcased Archie and Lilibet in their Netflix series for financial gain.

During the interview, the couple spoke passionately about protecting their kids from the dangers of social media.

However, this rhetoric felt hollow, especially when juxtaposed with their past choices to monetize their children's images.

The hypocrisy was glaring and did not go unnoticed by viewers.

What was meant to be an intimate glimpse into their lives quickly turned into a disjointed conversation that lacked depth.

The segment on children and social media ultimately fell flat, revealing a significant lack of preparation and coherence on the part of both the couple and the network.

CBS's struggle to weave a compelling narrative, combined with financial constraints and the couple's conflicting messages about privacy, resulted in an interview that felt forced—almost like a bad reality TV script.

The jumbled discussion on social media risks for their young children highlighted broader issues surrounding Harry and Meghan's public image management.

As they continue navigating their controversial positions in the public eye, skepticism remains high.

The world is watching closely, and many are left wondering if any narrative they present can truly be taken at face value.

The interview served as a reminder that when it comes to the Sussexes, the lines between authenticity and performance often blur.