Meghan Markle Accused of Jewel Theft Amidst Family Heirloom Speculations

In a sensational claim, the National Enquirer has alleged that Meghan Markle left the UK with jewelry that once belonged to Princess Diana.

This shocking accusation suggests that the Duchess of Sussex not only took these precious items but also refused to return them when asked.

As the story unfolds, it raises eyebrows and questions about the truth behind these claims.

The tabloid further alleged that Markle had her eye on Catherine Middleton's engagement ring, which was previously owned by the late Princess of Wales.

However, reports indicate that this particular demand was never fulfilled, leading many to wonder about the validity of these assertions.

The narrative paints a picture of a woman who is not only demanding but also willing to take what she believes should be hers.

In another twist, the outlet reported that Markle had requested an emerald tiara for her wedding day.

Instead, she settled for a diamond one, which has sparked speculation about her preferences and desires during her time in the royal spotlight.

Critics have pointed out that these claims seem to paint a picture of entitlement that many find hard to believe.

Adding fuel to the fire, Tom Bauer's new book, “Mostly Filled With Lies,” dives deeper into Markle's time in the limelight, suggesting she had a reputation for being difficult to work with.

According to the book, during a campaign for the Canadian clothing brand Raipmans, Markle allegedly bulldozed her way through the filming process with a long list of demands.

This behavior reportedly left one director so frustrated that he took to Facebook to express his exasperation.

While the director's post claiming Markle was “the meanest person” he had ever met is mentioned, it remains unverified.

Nevertheless, the book paints a vivid picture of a diva-like persona, with claims that Markle's agent warned that she would not film beyond a certain hour, leaving the set abruptly without any farewell.

In a surprising turn, Markle reportedly left behind a pair of aquamarine shoes, further adding to the chaotic narrative surrounding her time on set.

The tale of her departure contrasts sharply with the glamorous image she often portrays, leading many to question the authenticity of the reports circulating in the media.

As speculation swirls around Markle, jewelry expert Maxwell Stone weighs in on the potential future of her jewelry collection.

He estimates that her collection, which includes pieces once owned by Princess Diana, could be worth around £410,000.

Among the most valuable items is a stunning Cartier bracelet valued at £150,000, worn by Markle on her wedding day.

Stone elaborates on the exquisite details of the bracelet, crafted from 18-carat white gold and adorned with diamonds.

He suggests that this piece could become a sentimental heirloom for Markle and Prince Harry's daughter, Lilibet, to cherish in the future.

There's also mention of an Esprit Aquamarine ring, estimated at £75,000, which could potentially be passed down to Lilibet.

While no official confirmation has been made regarding Lilibet's inheritance, it is speculated that she may have to wait until she turns 18 to receive her share of the family treasures.

Meanwhile, Princess Charlotte, the daughter of Prince William, is also in line to inherit some beautiful heirlooms, particularly those connected to her grandmother Diana.

Reports suggest that discussions are already underway about specific pieces for Charlotte, including the iconic Spencer Tiara, which Diana wore on her wedding day.

Currently owned by Diana's brother, Charles, the 9th Earl of Spencer, this tiara has significant sentimental value and is highly sought after.

As the drama unfolds, the question remains: what will become of these royal heirlooms?