Meghan Markle’s Feminist Claims Under Fire: A Showbiz Dilemma

In a recent turn of events, Meghan Markle has found herself in hot water after comments she made about her time on the game show “Deal or No Deal.”

The former actress described feeling reduced to a mere “bimbo,” suggesting that her value was based solely on beauty rather than intellect.

This sparked a response from Ulrika Jonsson, who accused Meghan of abandoning her feminist principles in pursuit of fame and fortune.

In her column for The Sun, Jonsson expressed her disbelief at Markle's retrospective criticism of her role on the show.

She argued that Meghan's ambition seemed to overshadow her previously held beliefs.

According to Jonsson, starting out in roles like the one Meghan had shouldn't be seen as compromising one's integrity.

Instead, she suggested, it's about seizing opportunities.

Jonsson posed a provocative question: Why didn't Meghan speak out against how she was represented while on the show?

After all, her experiences didn't align with the feminist ideals she now champions.

It seems that Meghan was willing to overlook her principles for the sake of advancing her career, a point Jonsson emphasized in her piece.

Drawing from her own experience, Jonsson recalled her time as a weather girl, where she too faced similar stereotypes.

She noted that such roles are often stepping stones for women eager to climb the career ladder.

“I wish she would stop framing this as a feminist issue,” Jonsson lamented, highlighting the contradictions in Meghan's narrative.

Angela Epstein, editor of the Daily Express, echoed Jonsson's sentiments, pointing out that “Deal or No Deal” was hardly a platform for high art or serious discussion.

With 34 episodes under her belt, Meghan's departure from the show seemed less about principle and more about practicality.

Epstein suggested that the allure of exposure to millions of viewers likely outweighed any noble sentiments Meghan might express after the fact.

Critics argue that Meghan's reflections on her time in the spotlight come off as disingenuous.

Many believe that acknowledging the reality of entry-level jobs—however trivial they may seem—should be embraced rather than dismissed.

Jonsson insisted that taking a job for financial reasons is a common experience that should be respected.

It's worth noting that Meghan wasn't forced into her role on “Deal or No Deal.”

As Jonsson pointed out, it was likely a more appealing option than waiting tables, especially for someone looking to make a name for herself in Hollywood.

Adding fuel to the fire, Patricia Cara, another former briefcase model, stepped forward to refute Meghan's claims about the show.

Meghan had alleged on her podcast, “Archetypes,” that models underwent extensive makeovers backstage, including bra padding and eyelash extensions.

However, Cara strongly disagreed, stating, “There was no bra station.

There was no bra station.” Her comments directly contradicted Meghan's narrative, raising questions about the accuracy of the Duchess's portrayal of her experiences on the show.

This back-and-forth has ignited a broader conversation about the complexities of feminism in the entertainment industry.

Many are left wondering if Meghan's journey truly reflects the struggles women face in showbiz or if it serves as a convenient narrative to craft her public image.