Netflix in Crisis: Backlash Over Stock Photos Sparks Emergency Meetings

In a surprising turn of events, Netflix executives have found themselves in a whirlwind of emergency meetings, all thanks to a public outcry over the use of stock images in the trailers for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's upcoming series.

The situation escalated quickly when Jesus and Ricky Rosas, known as The Body Language Guy, took to Twitter to reveal that their sources within Netflix confirmed these frantic discussions were underway.

The backlash has been described as a “shitstorm of epic proportions,” particularly resonating with those who feel misled by the couple's portrayal of their lives.

Critics have been vocal on social media, pointing out the glaring inconsistencies in the couple's narrative.

Many users expressed disbelief over the couple's claims of being hounded by paparazzi while relying on stock images to illustrate their experiences.

One user questioned, “Why use other people's experiences in a reality series about your life?” This sentiment echoes the frustration of many who feel that Harry and Meghan are not living authentically, but rather fabricating a narrative that doesn't reflect their reality.

The criticism didn't stop there.

Another Twitter user chimed in, suggesting that if the couple's claims of harassment were genuine, they wouldn't need to resort to stock footage.

This growing skepticism has led to a broader conversation about authenticity and credibility in storytelling—especially when it comes to a series that is meant to showcase their personal lives.

The drama isn't new for Netflix; just months ago, the streaming giant was embroiled in crisis talks following the cancellation of Meghan's animated series, Pearl, alongside a decline in subscriber numbers.

Reports indicated that Harry and Meghan even initiated an all-hands meeting to address concerns about the optics surrounding their projects.

Sources revealed that Meghan was eager to speak directly with Ted Sarandos, Netflix's co-CEO, signaling the seriousness of their predicament.

Adding fuel to the fire, the couple included an outdated photograph in their trailer montage—an 84-year-old image of children cheering, originally taken in 1938 during a royal event involving Queen Mary, not the Sussexes.

Royal biographer Angela Levin expressed disbelief at this oversight, suggesting that Meghan should have meticulously vetted the images used.

She emphasized the importance of accuracy, especially when crafting a narrative meant to resonate with viewers.

Levin's critique highlights a significant issue: the potential damage to the couple's credibility.

She remarked, “It looks ridiculous.

It absolutely damages their credibility.” The implication here is clear: in an age where information is readily accessible, inaccuracies can lead to public mockery and distrust.

The backlash raises questions about the professionalism of the couple's approach to their series.

Many wonder how such fundamental errors could occur, leading to accusations of being sneaky and untrustworthy.

If their goal is to elicit sympathy, the execution appears clumsy at best.

The stakes are high for Harry and Meghan, as their reputation hangs in the balance.

Critics argue that their reliance on misleading imagery may backfire, risking their entire public persona.

It's a precarious position, especially given their ongoing complaints about media manipulation and the truthfulness of press coverage.