Gavin Gingras: The Child Behind the Sussexes’ Archie Controversy?

Rumors are swirling around the internet, suggesting that Gavin Gingras, the son of CNN correspondent Bryn Gingras and a friend of Meghan Markle, might actually be the child depicted as Archie in recent photos released by the Sussexes.

A user on Tumblr ignited this speculation by comparing images of Gavin and Archie, claiming that the child presented by Meghan and Harry as their son is, in fact, Bryn's child.

In an eye-catching post, the Tumblr user overlaid two images side by side.

On the left, there's a snapshot of Gavin, while on the right, we see Archie.

The user insists that these images have not been altered in any way, leading to a provocative discussion about the authenticity of the Sussexes' claims.

This comparison has sparked curiosity and debate across various social media platforms.

Adding fuel to the fire, another comparison showcases a screenshot of Archie from the Sussexes' Oprah interview next to a picture of Gavin.

The latter image was reportedly shared just days before the interview aired, courtesy of Silvertree, a close friend of Meghan who collaborated with her on the show “Suits.”

The post purportedly featured Archie alongside Meghan and two unidentified children, but some believe it actually depicts Bryn and Gavin.

The conversation doesn't stop there.

On Quora, users have been dissecting the resemblance between Archie and Gavin.

One commenter, Michael DeWard, expressed his confusion upon seeing photos of Meghan with Archie published on Page Six.

He noted that these images surfaced on Prince Louis's third birthday, suggesting that Meghan might have aimed to divert attention on that day.

DeWard also pointed out that these recent photos are not just significant because they show Harry's return to the U.S.; they might be the first clear images of Archie since the family relocated to Los Angeles.

However, he admitted to having doubts about the existence of a child named Archie living with the Sussexes.

Some theories propose that Archie does exist but was born via surrogate, who may have kept him after birth.

This idea could potentially explain why the couple rarely takes him out and why public sightings have been so scarce.

Interestingly, while the royal family acknowledges Archie's existence, they remain tight-lipped about him, leading to further speculation.

So, do these new images change the narrative?

Are they definitive proof that Archie lives with Meghan and Harry, who seem to go to great lengths to keep him out of the public eye?

Initially confused, DeWard recalled a story about a CNN reporter—Bryn Gingras—whose child was rumored to have been used in footage during the Oprah interview.

After digging deeper, he found a photo of Bryn with her family, featuring a son, Gavin, who bears a striking resemblance to Archie.

It's a troubling thought to involve an innocent child in such discussions, yet the implications are hard to ignore.

If any deceit is happening, it's the parents who should be held accountable.

The Oprah Winfrey interview has undoubtedly generated significant buzz—and revenue.

But at what cost?

The potential for using children in public narratives raises ethical questions that linger in the air.

As this story unfolds, the truth behind the Sussexes and their claims about Archie remains shrouded in mystery, leaving many to wonder what the real story is.