Meghan Markle’s Podcast: A Strategic Move in the Royal Feud?

In a recent twist in the ongoing saga of Meghan Markle and the British royal family, the Duchess of Sussex has stirred the pot once again.

This time, her new Spotify podcast seems to be more than just a platform for storytelling; it's shaping up to be a strategic response to critics.

The latest buzz comes after Meghan's first episode aired, which many believe is aimed at settling scores with her detractors.

Brittany from the Royal News Network highlighted an intriguing moment on Instagram.

She pointed to a chapter in Tom Bower's book, where he recounts a conversation with journalist Sam Kashner.

In this exchange, Kashner attempted to retract a claim that Meghan had criticized his stutter.

This incident sets the stage for Meghan's recent interview with The Cut, where she scrutinized the journalist's eye contact—an unusual move for someone in her position.

It appears that Meghan was attempting to sway the reporter to her side during their discussion.

Showbiz journalist Kinsey Schofield weighed in on the implications of Meghan's podcast release.

According to Schofield, the timing of the podcast suggests a desire to push back against accusations made by Bower, who labeled Meghan as ambitious and scheming in his book “Revenge.” This narrative seems to be a direct challenge to the image Bower painted of her, and Schofield argues that Meghan is using her platform to respond to these claims.

Schofield made a compelling point, stating that marrying a prince should not be viewed as a sign of ambition but rather as winning the lottery.

She believes that Meghan's podcast serves a dual purpose, allowing her to address the criticisms head-on while simultaneously seeking to reclaim her narrative.

In the first episode, Meghan dives into the labels and stereotypes that have been applied to her, making it clear that she wants to redefine how she is perceived.

The podcast also touches on personal relationships, including Meghan's dynamic with Serena Williams.

Bower mentioned that Williams described their friendship as not particularly close, a claim that Meghan seems eager to clarify.

By addressing these topics right out of the gate, Meghan is setting the tone for what listeners can expect from her series.

Adding fuel to the fire, Piers Morgan expressed his disdain for Meghan's self-description as a “real-life princess” during her interview with The Cut.

His scathing Twitter post, complete with a vomit emoji, reflects the sentiment of many who feel that Meghan's claim is at odds with her decision to step away from royal duties.

In her conversation with Alison P. Davis, Meghan spoke about the importance of forgiveness, especially in the wake of the Megxit controversy.

She emphasized that holding onto grudges takes more energy than forgiving, showcasing a softer side amid the media storm.

However, her remarks have not shielded her from criticism.

Royal expert Russell Myers took aim at Meghan's comments regarding her title.

Appearing on Lorraine, he argued that Meghan cannot complain about public perception while still holding onto her royal titles.

He believes that once she and Harry chose to leave Buckingham Palace, they forfeited the right to be addressed as royals.

Myers further criticized Meghan's tendency to portray herself as a role model for young girls, noting that her departure from the royal family contradicts this narrative.

He suggested that her insistence on being seen as a “real-life princess” undermines her credibility, given her choice to distance herself from royal life.

As the public continues to dissect Meghan's words and actions, the debate surrounding her intentions remains heated.

The podcast, rather than simply being a creative outlet, appears to be a calculated move designed to address longstanding grievances and reshape her public image.