Prince Harry’s Royal Rage: A Title Denied Sparks Outrage

In a surprising twist during an interview for the documentary “Tabloids on Trial,” Prince Harry found himself fuming after ITV journalist Rebecca Barry opted not to refer to him by his royal title.

This incident, which aired on ITV, has ignited discussions about respect, protocol, and the ongoing tensions between the Duke of Sussex and the British press.

During the explosive interview, Harry unleashed a barrage of accusations against the media, claiming they inflicted significant pain on both him and his wife, Meghan Markle.

However, it was Barry's choice to forgo using his title that particularly riled him.

Sources close to the royal family revealed that Harry perceived this as a blatant slight, viewing it as an intentional move to diminish his stature.

Insiders report that the Duke was visibly upset and demanded clarity from the production team, insisting that traditional royal etiquette be upheld.

“Harry was absolutely livid that Rebecca didn't address him as Prince,” one source disclosed.

For him, this omission is more than just a formality; it symbolizes a lack of respect that he feels is crucial to his identity.

This incident adds fuel to the already fiery relationship between the Sussexes and the British media, a dynamic that has been marred by Harry's ongoing legal disputes with various tabloids.

The Prince has long been vocal about his disdain for what he considers unethical practices within the press, often citing invasions of privacy as a primary grievance.

Yet, some observers argue that Harry's reaction reveals an overly sensitive nature.

Critics suggest that he struggles to cope with even minor perceived slights to his royal standing.

“He needs to get over himself,” remarked one royal commentator.

“The media isn't here to cater to his every whim and demand.”

This clash over titles raises questions about Harry's desire for a more private life.

If he seeks to distance himself from the monarchy's trappings, why does he insist on maintaining such strict adherence to royal protocol?

The contradiction hasn't gone unnoticed, leading many to speculate on the authenticity of his claims.