Connect with us

US News

**Controversy Surrounding Alleged Photoshop of Royal Baby Lilibet Sparks Debate**

Photos: GETTY

The News

**Controversy Surrounding Alleged Photoshop of Royal Baby Lilibet Sparks Debate**

Stassi and her friend French recently returned from their Mummy Dearest Tour in Texas, where they shared captivating stories from their adventures.

During a podcast on Audioboom, Stassi Schroeder-Clark vehemently denied the rumors suggesting that she allowed her child, Hartford, to be used as a stand-in for .

Dismissing the claims as baseless, Stassi accused Megan of illegally manipulating images to create a false representation of .

Despite acknowledging a resemblance between Hartford and Lilibet, Stassi adamantly refuted any involvement in such deceitful practices.

In an attempt to quell the speculation, Stassi proposed a solution to put the rumors to rest once and for all.

She suggested arranging a public appearance where Hartford and Lilibet could be seen together, such as at a polo match.

By showcasing the two girls side by side in real life, Stassi believed any doubts regarding potential photo manipulation would be dispelled.

However, the feasibility of this plan is questionable, given the emerging reports casting doubt on Lilibet's existence.

A leaked revelation on Twitter has thrown further uncertainty into the mix, claiming that Lilibet may not be a real entity.

According to the source, complications arose, leading the birth mother to retain custody of the child, thereby thwarting Megan and Harry's purported adoption plans.

The controversy extends beyond mere misidentification, with allegations surfacing that Megan engaged in sophisticated photo editing techniques to fabricate Lilibet's existence.

The authenticity of images featuring Lilibet has come under scrutiny, with critics pointing out inconsistencies and anomalies in the photos circulated by Megan.

Notably, a black and white image of Meg holding Lilibet, which appears to have been digitally altered, has raised suspicions.

Observers have highlighted discrepancies in the background elements of the picture, suggesting possible digital manipulation to enhance or modify certain aspects.

While Stassi refutes any involvement in the alleged deception surrounding Lilibet, suspicions persist regarding Megan's proficiency in photo editing.

Speculation abounds that Megan may have utilized her adept skills to composite images of Lilibet, potentially incorporating features from multiple sources.

The evolving appearances of the Harkle children in photographs have fueled speculation about the extent of digital alterations applied to portray a certain narrative.

The ongoing controversy surrounding the authenticity of images featuring Lilibet underscores the complexities of modern media manipulation.

As the debate rages on, questions linger about the veracity of representations in the public domain and the implications of digital alterations on perceptions of reality.

More in The News

Top stories

To Top