The News
**Veteran Journalist Nicholas Whitchell Criticizes Prince Harry and Meghan Markle**
Renowned journalist Nicholas Whitchell has delivered a scathing critique of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as he prepares to step away from the limelight.
After spending 25 years crafting reports on the Royal Family, Whitchell is finally bidding farewell to his role at the BBC, where he felt constrained by the strict guidelines of a reporter.
However, with retirement on the horizon, he now feels liberated to express his unfiltered opinions.
Whitchell, who has been a familiar face on Christmas Day broadcasts for a quarter of a century, recently reflected on his career at New Broadcasting House.
Despite acknowledging the soap opera-like intrigue surrounding Harry and Meghan, he confessed that such tabloid fodder was not his preferred style of reporting.
In a candid piece for the Sunday Times, he admitted to feeling out of place amidst the scandalous narratives that often dominate royal coverage.
Having dedicated decades to covering the monarchy, Whitchell's professionalism was put to the test during a live broadcast announcing the birth of baby Archie in 2019.
Struggling to find the right words outside Buckingham Palace, he unexpectedly handed over the reins to the studio, sparking concerns about his well-being.
This rare stumble led to speculation about his health and competence, especially after he had previously faced criticism from Prince Charles.
In his forthcoming retirement article, Whitchell delves into the behind-the-scenes turmoil he experienced during the ill-fated broadcast.
He candidly admits to a lack of enthusiasm for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, suggesting that his disinterest may have contributed to his on-air flub.
Reflecting on the incident, he describes it as his most embarrassing moment in nearly five decades of broadcasting, emphasizing the challenge of portraying a positive narrative about the royal couple.
Despite the public support he received following the mishap, Whitchell confesses that his confidence took a significant blow, preventing him from revisiting the footage of that fateful broadcast.
The unexpected announcement of Archie's birth, shrouded in secrecy and deviation from royal protocols, added to the complexity of the situation.
Whitchell questions whether there was more to the story than met the eye, hinting at underlying tensions within the palace.
As whispers of discord within the royal family persist, Whitchell raises poignant questions about the handling of Meghan's integration into the monarchy.
Criticizing the hasty bestowal of titles and patronages upon her, he suggests that a more gradual assimilation process could have averted the current controversies.
Furthermore, he highlights the power dynamics within the family, insinuating that Harry's influence may have led to missteps that are now coming to light.
In the wake of his impending retirement, Whitchell's reflections offer a glimpse into the complexities of royal reporting and the challenges faced by journalists navigating the intricate web of palace politics.
As he prepares to hang up his microphone, his parting words serve as a reminder of the ever-evolving dynamics within the British monarchy and the enduring fascination it holds for audiences worldwide.