**Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Unconventional Christmas Bid Criticized by Royal Expert**

Renowned royal expert Richard Eaton, the diary editor of the Daily Mail, has strongly rebuked Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's unconventional approach to securing an invitation to Christmas at Sandringham.

In a recent episode of Palace Confidential, Eaton likened the couple's efforts to an awkward encounter at a school dance, expressing concerns about potential tensions and trust issues.

He criticized their reliance on friends to convey their desire for an invitation, stating that direct communication with the king would be more appropriate.

Eaton highlighted the absurdity of their indirect approach and emphasized the need for a genuine and sincere dialogue.

Eaton's criticism extended to the couple's Hollywood-influenced communication style, suggesting that Meghan's background may have shaped their reliance on intermediaries.

He humorously proposed inviting the king to California as an alternative to seeking a traditional Christmas invitation.

Palace experts echoed Eaton's sentiments, advocating for direct communication with other members of the royal family to express their holiday wishes.

They emphasized the importance of authenticity and sincerity in repairing strained relationships within the monarchy.

Despite the potential for tensions and mistrust, Richard Eaton and Palace experts voiced skepticism about Meghan and Harry's readiness for a genuine reconciliation.

They questioned the couple's motives and highlighted the challenges of rebuilding trust after years of public criticism.

The experts underscored the intricacies of royal protocol and the family's cautious approach to including individuals who have openly criticized them.

Royal correspondent Rebecca English raised doubts about the timing and sincerity of Meghan and Harry's Christmas bid, noting the complexities of their strained relationship with the royal family.

She emphasized the need for behind-the-scenes reconciliation efforts rather than public displays, citing past missed opportunities for meaningful dialogue.

English expressed concerns about the couple's intentions and the potential for further tensions during public events like the Christmas morning church walk.

Natasha Livingston highlighted the estrangement between the king and Meghan and Harry's children, suggesting a link between family dynamics and limited interactions.

She humorously questioned the legitimacy of the grandchildren, adding a lighthearted tone to the discussion.

Livingston emphasized the importance of fostering closer ties within the family and addressing underlying tensions to promote a more harmonious relationship.

Richard Eden delved into Meghan's public engagements and the perceived shift from royal duties to celebrity appearances.

He lamented missed opportunities for the couple to participate in significant state events as working royals, underscoring the impact of their decision to step back from their royal roles.

Eden emphasized the contrast between their current celebrity status and the influential roles they once held within the monarchy, highlighting the potential consequences of their choices.

In conclusion, the scrutiny surrounding Meghan and Harry's Christmas bid reflects deeper tensions within the royal family and the complexities of rebuilding trust and relationships.

The experts' critiques underscore the challenges of navigating public expectations and personal desires within the monarchy.

As the holiday season approaches, the spotlight on the couple's interactions with the royal family intensifies, raising questions about their future roles and the path to reconciliation.