The News
Shameless Flip Side of Meg’s Title
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, is facing criticism for her recent actions in the United States, where she has been actively using her royal title to push political agendas.
The 40-year-old royal contacted Republican Senators Shelley Moore Capito and Susan Collins on their private numbers to advocate for paid parental leave and a climate policy.
Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand facilitated these communications, expressing that Meghan would be part of a group focusing on long-term paid leave initiatives.
Royal expert Jonathan Sacerdotty cautioned Meghan against leveraging her title in such a manner, suggesting that her ambitions may be leaning more towards activism than politics.
Speaking to Express.co.uk, Mr. Sacerdotty highlighted the potential risks of associating the royal family with political causes, especially in the American context.
While acknowledging Meghan's right to use her title, he emphasized the need for careful consideration regarding political involvement, given her ties to the monarchy.
In a similar vein, royal commentator Hillary Fordwich criticized Meghan's lobbying efforts, pointing out that as an unelected figure, she lacks the democratic mandate to engage in such activities.
Fordwich questioned the appropriateness of Meghan's involvement in political discussions, particularly regarding issues like paid family leave.
The commentator underscored the importance of respecting democratic processes and raised concerns about Meghan's increasing political engagements.
Furthermore, reports from Access Hollywood revealed that Meghan's outreach to US senators extends beyond the initial contacts, with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand playing a pivotal role in facilitating these connections.
The Duchess of Sussex is poised to join a working group focusing on long-term paid leave strategies, indicating her commitment to advancing social causes in her new environment.
Amidst these developments, calls have emerged for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to distance themselves from their royal titles to mitigate tensions with the British monarchy.
Royal commentator Kinsey Schofield suggested that relinquishing their titles could help the couple navigate the complexities of their public image, especially in light of recent controversies and disputes within the royal family.
Schofield expressed concerns about the couple's approach to public relations, highlighting perceived tendencies towards vindictiveness and competition.
As the spotlight continues to shine on Meghan and Harry's evolving roles in both the US and the UK, questions persist about the implications of their actions and the dynamics of their relationship with the royal family.
The intersection of royalty, politics, and social advocacy presents a complex landscape for the couple to navigate, raising broader discussions about the boundaries of royal influence and personal activism.
With ongoing debates surrounding Meghan's use of her title and the couple's public engagements, the saga of Harry and Meghan unfolds against a backdrop of scrutiny and speculation.