Connect with us

US News

**Prince Harry and Meghan’s Discontent: Loss of Privileges for Non-Titled Kids**

Photos: GETTY

The News

**Prince Harry and Meghan’s Discontent: Loss of Privileges for Non-Titled Kids**

Gertrude Daly, a renowned royal expert, has suggested that and Meghan's decision to leave the UK may have been influenced by the perceived lack of privileges for their non-titled children.

According to Daly, the couple's move to California could be attributed to the absence of certain entitlements typically associated with prince and princess titles for their offspring.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex made headlines on January 8, 2020, when they announced their intention to step back from senior royal duties.

Subsequently, in a highly publicized interview with in March of this year, Harry and Meghan raised allegations of mistreatment and racial discrimination within the royal family.

In an exclusive statement to the Daily Star, Gertrude Daly, host of the popular Gert's Royal podcast, suggested that Harry and Meghan strategically leveraged the public's limited understanding of British title conventions to their advantage.

Daly remarked, “I think what upset the Sussexes was the loss of the privileges that come with not having the title prince or princess.”

The controversy surrounding the titles of Harry and Meghan's children came to the forefront following the birth of their son, , in May 2019.

While initial reports indicated that would not be bestowed with a prince title to ensure a semblance of normalcy, Meghan alleged during the Oprah interview that the monarchy deliberately denied him a title.

Daly clarified that the decision regarding Harry's children not receiving prince or princess titles was established long ago under a century-old protocol dating back to 1917.

She emphasized that the rule limiting the title entitlements of Harry's offspring during 's reign had historical precedence.

During her candid conversation with , Meghan disclosed that the palace had decreed that Archie, the Queen's great-grandson, would not be granted a title, contrary to established protocol.

Meghan expressed concerns over the lack of security measures for Archie, alongside discussions about his potential skin color, highlighting underlying issues within the royal family.

Despite being bestowed with the titles of Duke and Duchess of Sussex by upon their marriage in 2018, Harry and Meghan opted not to assign a courtesy title to Archie, who was born Earl of Dumbarton.

This decision deviated from traditional practices, as great-grandchildren of the monarch typically do not hold prince or princess titles.

Looking ahead, there remains a possibility that Archie may receive a royal title in the future.

Once Prince Charles ascends to the throne, Archie is poised to inherit the prince title as the offspring of a son of the king, aligning with established royal succession protocols.

In essence, the controversy surrounding and Meghan's departure from royal duties stems from a nuanced interplay of historical traditions, personal choices, and perceptions of privilege within the British monarchy.

As the couple continues to navigate their post-royal life in California, the debate over titles and entitlements for their children underscores broader conversations about tradition, modernity, and inclusivity within the royal institution.

More in The News

Top stories

To Top