**Meghan Markle’s Credibility Challenged Amid Allegations of Cooperation with Finding Freedom Authors**

New evidence has emerged in the ongoing legal battle between Meghan Markle and Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), shedding light on the Duchess of Sussex's alleged cooperation with the authors of Finding Freedom.

The controversial biography sparked a fresh wave of revelations surrounding the Sussexes' tumultuous relationship with the royal family and their decision to step back as senior royals, known as Megxit.

During proceedings at the Court of Appeal in London, Andrew Caldicott QC, representing ANL, argued that the privacy case before Judge Lord Justice Warby had been founded on a false premise.

He contended that text messages from Meghan's former communications chief at Kensington Palace, Jason Knauf, raised doubts about the Duchess's credibility.

According to Caldicott, Meghan's letter to her father, Thomas Markle, was not solely intended for his eyes but crafted with potential public consumption in mind.

ANL maintained that Thomas Markle had the right to disclose the letter to address inaccuracies in an article published by People magazine, which featured interviews with Meghan's friends discussing the same correspondence.

Caldicott asserted that ANL's defense should have proceeded to trial, emphasizing that Meghan's claims were overshadowed by her father's right to respond to the People article's allegations of him cold-shouldering her before her wedding.

Furthermore, ANL highlighted discrepancies between what Markle purportedly said and how it was portrayed in the media, arguing that Meghan's expectation of privacy in the letter had diminished given its potential for public exposure.

The introduction of new evidence from Jason Knauf, now working for Prince William, contradicted Meghan's previous denials of collaborating with the Finding Freedom authors, suggesting a deeper involvement than acknowledged.

In response to these developments, Meghan's legal team contested the appeal, maintaining that the initial judgment was based on sound evidence.

They objected to the inclusion of Knauf's testimony and indicated that Meghan would seek to present additional evidence if necessary.

The complexity of the case deepened as conflicting accounts emerged, raising questions about the authenticity of Meghan's assertions regarding the private nature of the letter to her father.

Meanwhile, discussions surrounding Meghan's retention of her Duchess title garnered attention, with commentators questioning the privileges associated with royal status amid the ongoing controversies.

Dan Witton's remarks on GB News underscored the debate, with calls for the Duchess to relinquish her title resonating among critics.

Piers Morgan's vocal stance on social media added fuel to the discourse, emphasizing the need for decisive action regarding Meghan's royal affiliation.

As the legal saga unfolds and public scrutiny intensifies, the intricacies of Meghan Markle's past actions and statements come under heightened scrutiny.

The evolving narrative surrounding her interactions with the media and the royal family underscores the complexities of balancing personal privacy with public interest, setting the stage for a protracted legal battle with far-reaching implications for all parties involved.