**Rupert Everett Disputes Prince Harry’s Virginity Claims Behind a Pub**

Actor Rupert Everett has raised doubts regarding Prince Harry's assertion that he lost his virginity in a field behind a pub.

In an interview with the Telegraph magazine coinciding with the release of the Duke's highly anticipated memoir “Spares,” Everett challenged the Duke of Sussex's narrative.

Prince Harry had disclosed in his book that he engaged in an outdoor encounter with an older woman who treated him akin to a young stallion during his time as a student at Eton in 2001, when he would have been 17 years old.

In a passage from the memoir quoted by Page Six, Prince Harry described the experience as a “Glorious Episode,” recounting how the woman had a fondness for horses and likened his demeanor to that of a young stallion.

However, Rupert Everett contradicted this account by asserting that he knows the true identity of the woman involved and claimed that the incident did not transpire behind a pub nor within the UK.

When pressed on whether he insinuated that Prince Harry fabricated details to shield the woman's identity, Everett merely responded with a knowing smile, stating, “I'm just putting it out there, that I know.”

Furthermore, Everett expressed a shift in his perception of Prince Harry following the memoir's publication.

He admitted that his initial anger towards the Duke had transformed into pity, remarking, “It's made me change my view.

I was angry before, and now I just feel very sad.

Sad for Harry.”

The actor extended sympathy towards Prince Harry, especially in light of the backlash he faced over past controversies, such as the incident involving the Taliban, which alienated a segment of his supporters.

Amidst the speculation surrounding the identity of the woman in question, actress Liz Hurley and other individuals mentioned in connection with Prince Harry's past encounters have vehemently denied their involvement.

Susanna Harvey and Catherine O'Mahony, who were both linked to the Duke in separate incidents, refuted any association with the field encounter.

Harvey clarified her stance by dismissing the rumors and emphasizing her innocence, while O'Mahony adamantly stated that she detested horses, distancing herself from the alleged tryst.

In a separate revelation, a former soldier disclosed an incident involving Prince Harry in January 2012, where the Duke reportedly triggered an alarm button while in a sentry booth at St James's Palace after a night out.

The soldier recounted the prince's inebriated state, describing him as uncooperative and belligerent when attempts were made to assist him.

The soldier, critical of Prince Harry's portrayal in his memoir, highlighted the prince's reputation for disruptive behavior within military circles, particularly citing an incident where Harry's actions necessitated intervention from security personnel.

The unfolding narratives surrounding Prince Harry's past exploits and interactions continue to spark intrigue and skepticism, with various individuals offering contrasting perspectives on the Duke's character and experiences.

As the public delves deeper into the revelations presented in his memoir, debates and discussions surrounding Prince Harry's accounts are likely to persist, shaping perceptions of the royal figure and his tumultuous journey of self-discovery and scrutiny.